This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
None of them was with SIL: Nate_Saint was with Mission Aviation Fellowship. Jim Elliot, Ed McCully, Pete Fleming were with Christian Missions in Many Lands. Roger Youderian was from Gospel Missionary Union. See Talk:SIL_International or http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/74.html and http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/page.asp?page_id=545 -- Jabala
I have read many accounts of the death of the 5 missionaries, and this is the first one that stated (or at least implied) that somehow the missionaries either were the cause of 2 Huaorani deaths or directly .
I'm trying to find out what the source of this other version is, can anyone help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 ( talk • contribs).
Rival's account (2002) states that Dayuma's brother was shot by a missionary (Nate Saint, I think) and died of the wound later. Ill post details soon. -- Carwil 20:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Original question-asker here.. The book you are using as a source (which I assume is 'Trekking Through History' of 2002) isn't listed in sources below. In that book, which I don't own and have no easy access to, how is the source of the information presented? In other words, in Rival's account, what is her source as to the sequence of events? Having a fun time comparing reports of first hand accounts. Thanks! Once I Make a permanent account, I will be Gryfalia, but am not yet..;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 ( talk • contribs).
The article cites "(Saint, 2005)" as a reference for the tribe's violence, but there is no such reference in the list below. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feline1 ( talk • contribs).
Taromenane and Onamenane are Tucanoan tribes, by nomeans related to Huao. Nothing is known about Huinatare. This was told by the contacted Tagaeri in 1990s. There have been no peaceful contacts with the Taromenane and nobody knows which language they speak. Then how you can say that Taromenane are Huao?
SIL is now perpetuating ethnic cleansing of Huao. Although it is nice to convert as many as they can, destroying a culture should not be tolerated. It takes just one Rachel Saint to destroy a culture. But a destroyed culture can't be rebuilt by one million Rachel Saints.
Yea I'm sure it would be so much better for Huaorani if they were again living lawlessly and spearing each other at will. I mean seriously going back to living like a pack of animals would probably be better, right leftist fanatics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.151.197 ( talk) 16:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
This isn't a forum to parade your opinions and biases folks, no matter how much you hate "missionaries". Please read the talk page guidelines, "The purpose of an article's talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject." Philip72 ( talk) 00:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I went looking for a cite for this statement. I found several other pages that include this text nearly verbatim, and in particular I found a longer text in which these lines are contained. That site is anthropology.net. Unfortunately, (a) their longer text does not give a source for this statement, and (b) our article copies basically verbatim from their article, without sourcing them.
I think this needs to be cleaned up, both to give a proper citation for the material, and to avoid a charge of plagiarism of the anthropology.net text (even if they are a Wiki possibly under a GFDL, we still need to cite them!) Birdbrainscan 18:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I just moved the talk page from Talk:Huaorani to here, to agree with the (apparently undiscussed) move of the article itself. While Waodani is the more common term in evangelical circles, I believe that Huaorani is the preferred term in academic ones, and thus I don't agree with the page move. I'm willing to be convinced, however. Please give rationale for preferring Waodani over Huaorani. -- Spangineer ws (háblame) 15:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I rest my case. Birdbrainscan ( talk) 01:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
The actual name for this people group is Waodani, not Huorani. -- Tribe12 ( talk) 16:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Would the book written by Joe Kane called, 'Savages,' be a good reference? He lived with the Huaorani in 1996 for I believe three months. Mylittlezach ( talk) 21:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the picture about the "Huaorani ceremony" is from other indigenous group. Huaorani do not dress with colorful straps neither do they paint their faces red. The body paint (i.e. tattoo-like patterns on thighs and arms) the folks in the picture are using is not usually seen in Huaorani people. Huaorani men never use such colorful bands around their waist; instead, they use a string of cotton to hold their penises. I recommend changing this picture to something more representative of their culture. Daimi ( talk) 15:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
The article was completely re-written on June 15, 2010 by another editor. The new version A) is poorly referenced (once, for the whole articl), B) shows a narrow view of the subject, and C) removes a lot of detail that enriched the earlier article. Attempted restorations of the earlier version were turned back, possibly by the aforementioned user under different names. While this may represent vandalism, I would like to think that it is merely the work of an inexperienced and probably biased editor. While the version previous to the re-write wasn't perfect, it was clearly superior to what we have been left with. Unless someone has strong and reasonable objections, I will revert the article to an earlier version, perhaps making a few edits myself to try to improve it. If edit warring over the article continues, I will seek to have offending users blocked, or the page protected. DoctorEric ( talk) 21:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Huaorani people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
* No photos, but good list of references and links
|
Last edited at 00:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 18:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Huaorani people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Giraffestar ( article contribs).
I just read Through Gates of Splendor, and it doesn't mention that the photographs were why the Waorani attacked the missionaries. This was the first edition, published shortly after Operation Auca, so it might have been determined since then that the photos were the reason, but someone more familiar with this topic should probably check. 184.21.204.5 ( talk) 19:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
None of them was with SIL: Nate_Saint was with Mission Aviation Fellowship. Jim Elliot, Ed McCully, Pete Fleming were with Christian Missions in Many Lands. Roger Youderian was from Gospel Missionary Union. See Talk:SIL_International or http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/74.html and http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/page.asp?page_id=545 -- Jabala
I have read many accounts of the death of the 5 missionaries, and this is the first one that stated (or at least implied) that somehow the missionaries either were the cause of 2 Huaorani deaths or directly .
I'm trying to find out what the source of this other version is, can anyone help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 ( talk • contribs).
Rival's account (2002) states that Dayuma's brother was shot by a missionary (Nate Saint, I think) and died of the wound later. Ill post details soon. -- Carwil 20:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Original question-asker here.. The book you are using as a source (which I assume is 'Trekking Through History' of 2002) isn't listed in sources below. In that book, which I don't own and have no easy access to, how is the source of the information presented? In other words, in Rival's account, what is her source as to the sequence of events? Having a fun time comparing reports of first hand accounts. Thanks! Once I Make a permanent account, I will be Gryfalia, but am not yet..;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 ( talk • contribs).
The article cites "(Saint, 2005)" as a reference for the tribe's violence, but there is no such reference in the list below. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feline1 ( talk • contribs).
Taromenane and Onamenane are Tucanoan tribes, by nomeans related to Huao. Nothing is known about Huinatare. This was told by the contacted Tagaeri in 1990s. There have been no peaceful contacts with the Taromenane and nobody knows which language they speak. Then how you can say that Taromenane are Huao?
SIL is now perpetuating ethnic cleansing of Huao. Although it is nice to convert as many as they can, destroying a culture should not be tolerated. It takes just one Rachel Saint to destroy a culture. But a destroyed culture can't be rebuilt by one million Rachel Saints.
Yea I'm sure it would be so much better for Huaorani if they were again living lawlessly and spearing each other at will. I mean seriously going back to living like a pack of animals would probably be better, right leftist fanatics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.151.197 ( talk) 16:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
This isn't a forum to parade your opinions and biases folks, no matter how much you hate "missionaries". Please read the talk page guidelines, "The purpose of an article's talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject." Philip72 ( talk) 00:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I went looking for a cite for this statement. I found several other pages that include this text nearly verbatim, and in particular I found a longer text in which these lines are contained. That site is anthropology.net. Unfortunately, (a) their longer text does not give a source for this statement, and (b) our article copies basically verbatim from their article, without sourcing them.
I think this needs to be cleaned up, both to give a proper citation for the material, and to avoid a charge of plagiarism of the anthropology.net text (even if they are a Wiki possibly under a GFDL, we still need to cite them!) Birdbrainscan 18:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I just moved the talk page from Talk:Huaorani to here, to agree with the (apparently undiscussed) move of the article itself. While Waodani is the more common term in evangelical circles, I believe that Huaorani is the preferred term in academic ones, and thus I don't agree with the page move. I'm willing to be convinced, however. Please give rationale for preferring Waodani over Huaorani. -- Spangineer ws (háblame) 15:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I rest my case. Birdbrainscan ( talk) 01:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
The actual name for this people group is Waodani, not Huorani. -- Tribe12 ( talk) 16:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Would the book written by Joe Kane called, 'Savages,' be a good reference? He lived with the Huaorani in 1996 for I believe three months. Mylittlezach ( talk) 21:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that the picture about the "Huaorani ceremony" is from other indigenous group. Huaorani do not dress with colorful straps neither do they paint their faces red. The body paint (i.e. tattoo-like patterns on thighs and arms) the folks in the picture are using is not usually seen in Huaorani people. Huaorani men never use such colorful bands around their waist; instead, they use a string of cotton to hold their penises. I recommend changing this picture to something more representative of their culture. Daimi ( talk) 15:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
The article was completely re-written on June 15, 2010 by another editor. The new version A) is poorly referenced (once, for the whole articl), B) shows a narrow view of the subject, and C) removes a lot of detail that enriched the earlier article. Attempted restorations of the earlier version were turned back, possibly by the aforementioned user under different names. While this may represent vandalism, I would like to think that it is merely the work of an inexperienced and probably biased editor. While the version previous to the re-write wasn't perfect, it was clearly superior to what we have been left with. Unless someone has strong and reasonable objections, I will revert the article to an earlier version, perhaps making a few edits myself to try to improve it. If edit warring over the article continues, I will seek to have offending users blocked, or the page protected. DoctorEric ( talk) 21:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Huaorani people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
* No photos, but good list of references and links
|
Last edited at 00:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 18:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Huaorani people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Giraffestar ( article contribs).
I just read Through Gates of Splendor, and it doesn't mention that the photographs were why the Waorani attacked the missionaries. This was the first edition, published shortly after Operation Auca, so it might have been determined since then that the photos were the reason, but someone more familiar with this topic should probably check. 184.21.204.5 ( talk) 19:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)