GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sportsguy17 ( talk · contribs) 19:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
@
Kew Gardens 613: I'll be reviewing this article. On a first glance, it looks very solid. I'll have some detailed feedback in the next few days. In the meantime, if you could check for any bare references or dead links, that would be much appreciated. Best,
Sportsguy17 (
T •
C)
19:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
I took another read over the article. It has a bit of work to do still, but I'm fairly impressed with what I see. I'll post my detailed feedback later tomorrow. I would do it now but it's a bit late where I live and I'm getting an early start to my day tomorrow. I have high hopes for this article, so hopefully my feedback will help to solidify it as a GA. Until tomorrow, Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 03:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Kew Gardens 613: Detailed feedback as promised. Here we go:
One thing to add: I noticed inconsistencies throughout the article with rebuilds vs. remodeling/reconstruction in terms of the early 2000s project. Which was it? I personally got a bit confused by that so if you could make sure it all says one or the other throughout I'd appreciate it. Beyond that, once you are done making all the above changes, give it one more good copy edit and then I think it should be all set for GA status! Cheers, Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 02:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Sportsguy17 ( talk · contribs) 19:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
@
Kew Gardens 613: I'll be reviewing this article. On a first glance, it looks very solid. I'll have some detailed feedback in the next few days. In the meantime, if you could check for any bare references or dead links, that would be much appreciated. Best,
Sportsguy17 (
T •
C)
19:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
I took another read over the article. It has a bit of work to do still, but I'm fairly impressed with what I see. I'll post my detailed feedback later tomorrow. I would do it now but it's a bit late where I live and I'm getting an early start to my day tomorrow. I have high hopes for this article, so hopefully my feedback will help to solidify it as a GA. Until tomorrow, Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 03:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Kew Gardens 613: Detailed feedback as promised. Here we go:
One thing to add: I noticed inconsistencies throughout the article with rebuilds vs. remodeling/reconstruction in terms of the early 2000s project. Which was it? I personally got a bit confused by that so if you could make sure it all says one or the other throughout I'd appreciate it. Beyond that, once you are done making all the above changes, give it one more good copy edit and then I think it should be all set for GA status! Cheers, Sportsguy17 ( T • C) 02:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)