From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

I am reviewing this article as part of GA Sweeps. This is a good resource that could use some work to raise it to current standards of WP:WIAGA. I am about to outline a partial list of issues that need to be addressed. After I post this listing, I will give concerned and interested editors a week before I reevaluate the article's quality rating. I will be following along with the progress of the article and may make additional comments as it is appropriate.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Delisted-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 07:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics, Badenoch ( talk · contribs), BrendelSignature ( talk · contribs)-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • According to the link tool the article has 5 deadlinks.
  • According to the alt text tool the article needs WP:ALT text.
  • According to the dablink tool the article has one circular redirect and one dab page that need to be resolved.
  • Is it possible that any of the information could be updated without too much trouble. Most of it is five years old.
  • The WP:LEAD is extremely long. Please cut it from 4583 characters to less than 3200.
  • Please address the citation needed tags.
  • The article has several entire paragraphs that are without any citation. If the article is properly formatted with paragraphs covering distinct topics, each should have at least one citation.
  • The article begins with several one line paragraphs. Can these be merged or expanded.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • I have added {{ WPECON}}-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

I am reviewing this article as part of GA Sweeps. This is a good resource that could use some work to raise it to current standards of WP:WIAGA. I am about to outline a partial list of issues that need to be addressed. After I post this listing, I will give concerned and interested editors a week before I reevaluate the article's quality rating. I will be following along with the progress of the article and may make additional comments as it is appropriate.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Delisted-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 07:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics, Badenoch ( talk · contribs), BrendelSignature ( talk · contribs)-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • According to the link tool the article has 5 deadlinks.
  • According to the alt text tool the article needs WP:ALT text.
  • According to the dablink tool the article has one circular redirect and one dab page that need to be resolved.
  • Is it possible that any of the information could be updated without too much trouble. Most of it is five years old.
  • The WP:LEAD is extremely long. Please cut it from 4583 characters to less than 3200.
  • Please address the citation needed tags.
  • The article has several entire paragraphs that are without any citation. If the article is properly formatted with paragraphs covering distinct topics, each should have at least one citation.
  • The article begins with several one line paragraphs. Can these be merged or expanded.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply
  • I have added {{ WPECON}}-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook