![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The two "terror regimes" were not communism and fascism; they were the governments of Szálasi and Rákosi (and to a lesser extent, those of Horthy and Kádár). It is erroneous to mention ideologies to be terror regimes per se. Also, this article literally oozes of partiality. Remember, this is an online encyclopedia, not a propaganda outlet for Fidesz.
Ok plz improve page :-)
I agree that this is not a propagandalexikon, but if this is true, why I managed to found hardcore propaganda of szdsz without mentioning who says these "criticism"? "Some says", but who are they? See Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. 86.101.107.247 10:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Now I've reverted the last edit before me because I consider removing such a great part of an article without even commenting the "contribution" simply vandalism.
I agree that not everything on this page is relevant enough (e.g. link to the Treaty of Trianon or even Prices) but if anyone thinks so he can start a discussion about it.
That's what I'm doing right now :)
And I think the links to Communism and Nazism are more then relevant: they're obligatory.
--torzsmokus
OK - I've tried my best to re-shape this article into less of an advert (e.g. removing the prices, taking out opinions lifted straight off the museum's website) and more of an encyclopaedic article. I thought it was important to include information about the controversy that the museum has caused, but hope this is balanced with the positive views also mentioned in this sector. If anyone things this doesn't sound neutral enough - maybe more could be added to the positives (rather than deleting the negatives - better to have a fuller argument than none at all). -- Matt.berlin 17:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a short phrase. Xx236 ( talk) 11:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on House of Terror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The two "terror regimes" were not communism and fascism; they were the governments of Szálasi and Rákosi (and to a lesser extent, those of Horthy and Kádár). It is erroneous to mention ideologies to be terror regimes per se. Also, this article literally oozes of partiality. Remember, this is an online encyclopedia, not a propaganda outlet for Fidesz.
Ok plz improve page :-)
I agree that this is not a propagandalexikon, but if this is true, why I managed to found hardcore propaganda of szdsz without mentioning who says these "criticism"? "Some says", but who are they? See Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. 86.101.107.247 10:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Now I've reverted the last edit before me because I consider removing such a great part of an article without even commenting the "contribution" simply vandalism.
I agree that not everything on this page is relevant enough (e.g. link to the Treaty of Trianon or even Prices) but if anyone thinks so he can start a discussion about it.
That's what I'm doing right now :)
And I think the links to Communism and Nazism are more then relevant: they're obligatory.
--torzsmokus
OK - I've tried my best to re-shape this article into less of an advert (e.g. removing the prices, taking out opinions lifted straight off the museum's website) and more of an encyclopaedic article. I thought it was important to include information about the controversy that the museum has caused, but hope this is balanced with the positive views also mentioned in this sector. If anyone things this doesn't sound neutral enough - maybe more could be added to the positives (rather than deleting the negatives - better to have a fuller argument than none at all). -- Matt.berlin 17:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a short phrase. Xx236 ( talk) 11:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on House of Terror. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)