The
lead section does not adequately summarize the entire article. There's next to nothing about production or much on summary of critical reaction, or even plot.
The lead has been expanded to touch on the various topics within the article. I removed some of the unrelated statements in the lead and moved them to within the article. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The plot is too long; it should be cut down to a more succinct and readable length.
There are a lot of one or two-line paragraphs, which aren't really paragraphs (examples: second paragraph of "script and locations", first paragraph of "homage", last paragraph of "filming". These either need to be cut, expanded, or merged if applicable.
While I'm on the subject, the formatting of the production section makes no logical sense, with postproduction coming before discussions about filming.
Unsourced statements throughout, particularly home video and the end of the cast section. All these need reliable citations.
I removed many unsourced statements and added citations for others. A lot of information has snuck in here that I haven't paid attention to very closely in my watchlist. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm always glad to see one of my GAs swept from the list, and I still got a few left for reviewers to look at. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The
lead section does not adequately summarize the entire article. There's next to nothing about production or much on summary of critical reaction, or even plot.
The lead has been expanded to touch on the various topics within the article. I removed some of the unrelated statements in the lead and moved them to within the article. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The plot is too long; it should be cut down to a more succinct and readable length.
There are a lot of one or two-line paragraphs, which aren't really paragraphs (examples: second paragraph of "script and locations", first paragraph of "homage", last paragraph of "filming". These either need to be cut, expanded, or merged if applicable.
While I'm on the subject, the formatting of the production section makes no logical sense, with postproduction coming before discussions about filming.
Unsourced statements throughout, particularly home video and the end of the cast section. All these need reliable citations.
I removed many unsourced statements and added citations for others. A lot of information has snuck in here that I haven't paid attention to very closely in my watchlist. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm always glad to see one of my GAs swept from the list, and I still got a few left for reviewers to look at. --Happy editing!
Nehrams2020 (
talk •
contrib)
04:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)reply