![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
VfD vote - removed July 20, 2024 - no concensus to delete As with History of homosexuality, this page should be a section of Religion and sexuality. Hyacinth 18:34, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
|
I moved a number of external links that were in the article to a "links" section. Generally (there might be some exceptions), we're trying to write our own information here, not a web directory. So we should only very, very rarely, if ever, say "see [URL] for more information." Why not? Because we want to include that information ourselves, eventually.
On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with making an annotated list of external links.
-- LMS
I removed the Wiccan views of homosexuality from this page since this page only has links to the very general religions (Christianity, Islam, Neopaganism etc.). I think that the more specific sects' (like Wicca's) views on homosexuality fit better on the specific religions' "views of homosexuality" pages as opposed to this one. The "Jewish views on homosexuality" page does this nicely and I think using that as a model works well.
?!? Richard Stallman is not a religion. He is an American citizen who happens to be a computer programmer. I doubt that he has a faith based on his teachings. (Free-softwareism?) RK
Cut from article:
The Buddhist_views_of_homosexuality article doesn't call homosexality "a valid human trait" OR "inherently sinful". -- Uncle Ed 13:17, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
VfD vote - removed July 20, 2024 - no concensus to delete As with History of homosexuality, this page should be a section of Religion and sexuality. Hyacinth 18:34, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
|
I moved a number of external links that were in the article to a "links" section. Generally (there might be some exceptions), we're trying to write our own information here, not a web directory. So we should only very, very rarely, if ever, say "see [URL] for more information." Why not? Because we want to include that information ourselves, eventually.
On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with making an annotated list of external links.
-- LMS
I removed the Wiccan views of homosexuality from this page since this page only has links to the very general religions (Christianity, Islam, Neopaganism etc.). I think that the more specific sects' (like Wicca's) views on homosexuality fit better on the specific religions' "views of homosexuality" pages as opposed to this one. The "Jewish views on homosexuality" page does this nicely and I think using that as a model works well.
?!? Richard Stallman is not a religion. He is an American citizen who happens to be a computer programmer. I doubt that he has a faith based on his teachings. (Free-softwareism?) RK
Cut from article:
The Buddhist_views_of_homosexuality article doesn't call homosexality "a valid human trait" OR "inherently sinful". -- Uncle Ed 13:17, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)