This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Homer to the Max article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Homer to the Max has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Homer to the Max is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
"Homer discovers a television hero with the same name as him is broadcasting in Springfield, and is delighted with the subsequent positive attention he is receiving because of it." I struggle with this sentence. "hero with same name as him"... seems to be less than ideal, but I am not an expert.
How about? "Homer discovers that a television show broadcasting in Springfield, "Police Cops", has a hero named Homer Simpson. The local Homer is delighted with the positive attention he receives because of it."
It still isn't ideal... sinneed ( talk) 04:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Other than that, everything is fine, so I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 ( talk) 22:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Short but sweet, so perfect for a GAN. Just fix up the fair use rationale and it will be fine. Good work. Peanut4 ( talk) 20:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
"Overall, the episode was received well by critics, earning a Nielsen rating of 8.5." The Nielsen rating is an audience rating, not a critic rating. IMO it should not be here. But it most especially should not be incorrectly cited as a critic rating. If there *IS* a Nielsen rating just for critics, that is great, but I have never heard of it, and the linky does not take me to it. I just noticed that my change was reverted out, and that the reverting editor said that only critic ratings were cited here. That seems not to be the case, which was why I made the change. sinneed ( talk) 15:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Homer to the Max article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Homer to the Max has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Homer to the Max is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
"Homer discovers a television hero with the same name as him is broadcasting in Springfield, and is delighted with the subsequent positive attention he is receiving because of it." I struggle with this sentence. "hero with same name as him"... seems to be less than ideal, but I am not an expert.
How about? "Homer discovers that a television show broadcasting in Springfield, "Police Cops", has a hero named Homer Simpson. The local Homer is delighted with the positive attention he receives because of it."
It still isn't ideal... sinneed ( talk) 04:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Other than that, everything is fine, so I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 ( talk) 22:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Short but sweet, so perfect for a GAN. Just fix up the fair use rationale and it will be fine. Good work. Peanut4 ( talk) 20:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
"Overall, the episode was received well by critics, earning a Nielsen rating of 8.5." The Nielsen rating is an audience rating, not a critic rating. IMO it should not be here. But it most especially should not be incorrectly cited as a critic rating. If there *IS* a Nielsen rating just for critics, that is great, but I have never heard of it, and the linky does not take me to it. I just noticed that my change was reverted out, and that the reverting editor said that only critic ratings were cited here. That seems not to be the case, which was why I made the change. sinneed ( talk) 15:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)