This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
The article has a lot of odd wording and will need quite a bit of copy-editing and general tone altering
There are a few opinion sounding sentences like "Game Boy port is superior to the Game Boy version of the original game" - Superior in what way? I don't know if this is the editors opinion or the game was technically improved.
I think the article might benefit from having a subtitle for each port, at the moment it's one massive section and means it will take readers a while to find the section they're actually looking for.
Since the content of the article is there as far as I can tell, and well referenced, I think it's a C class, but still requires writing in a different way.
Samwalton9 (
talk)
21:56, 6 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Isn't this article kinda crufty?
It doesn't seem to me that this topic is notable. In fact, it's got a lot of really niche, nerdy info only certain people would care about, and I know because I happen to be one of those people. It's the only article of its kind in either of the categories to which it currently belongs. See also
WP:GAMECRUFT, particularly Point #10. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist(Speak quickly)(Follow my trail)04:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
The article has a lot of odd wording and will need quite a bit of copy-editing and general tone altering
There are a few opinion sounding sentences like "Game Boy port is superior to the Game Boy version of the original game" - Superior in what way? I don't know if this is the editors opinion or the game was technically improved.
I think the article might benefit from having a subtitle for each port, at the moment it's one massive section and means it will take readers a while to find the section they're actually looking for.
Since the content of the article is there as far as I can tell, and well referenced, I think it's a C class, but still requires writing in a different way.
Samwalton9 (
talk)
21:56, 6 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Isn't this article kinda crufty?
It doesn't seem to me that this topic is notable. In fact, it's got a lot of really niche, nerdy info only certain people would care about, and I know because I happen to be one of those people. It's the only article of its kind in either of the categories to which it currently belongs. See also
WP:GAMECRUFT, particularly Point #10. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist(Speak quickly)(Follow my trail)04:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply