This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 30 April 2017 by reviewer SwisterTwister ( talk · contribs). Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Hungary This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

@ Kovács Krisztina: I'm inclined to think that this topic merits an article on Wikipedia, but I haven't yet gone through the sources to satisfy myself on that point. In the meantime, I have a few comments:

1. I'm not seeing why we need to list Mariapocs as a "See also" article. But even if there is a good reason for this, we still don't need the external link to the city's website page for the church there. That link would be better placed in the article on Mariapocs, not here.
2. We really don't need all of those section headings. Having so many headings, each one containing only two or three sentences, just makes the article look incomplete. The article will be viewed more favorably by other reviewers if the section heading were removed.
3. Footnote #4 (to mariaut.hu) goes to a landing page that doesn't seem to support the material in the article. Was there a more specific page at that site that you are using as a resource? If so, the link should go directly to that sub-page.

I'll try to take another look at the draft later this week. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 13:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC) reply