This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Holler (Spice Girls song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Holler (Spice Girls song) has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 8, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Very weird edit:
Someone overwrote the previous article about a purported god from Norse mythology with this un-wikified text. I think the god is bogus so don't bother creating a disambiguation page. - Haukurth 23:32, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
True: Holler is really a Norse God according to these pages. http://www.musesrealm.net/norse/gods.html http://www.pantheon.org/articles/h/holler.html manojar 07:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Manojar
If it was not released in the USA, how did it get a position in the US chart? Astrotrain 21:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
In Chisholm's solo room, the wood does not become a python. Close to the end of the video there is a snake on the wood and this snake transforms into a python.
Johnnyboytoy ( talk) 15:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved Kotniski ( talk) 13:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Holler →
Holler (Spice Girls song) — I do not believe that we can conclusively determine a primary topic for this title. There are too many possible meanings.
Powers
T 00:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Holler (Spice Girls song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Garnet-Septagon ( talk · contribs) 15:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm going to be reviewing this article as per the
WP:GACR. Apologies for the delay in someone getting around to taking a look at it.
For this section I'm looking at the revision as of 12:02, 20 June 2023
Passed Not a long way from meeting any of the GA criteria
Passed All media is CC licenced or has a thorough fair-use rationale
Passed No cleanup tags
Passed Stable
Passed No previous GA nomination
For this section I'm looking at the revision as of 12:02, 20 June 2023
Spotchecks are a GA requirement; I'll pick a few citations and check to see that the source correctly supports the citation.
Sources are all reliable, mostly music magazines and news outlets.
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Broadly very good, I'll continue with the review and leave these to be addressed alongside my comments below.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All below issues Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC) A few notes on wording/citations:
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Holler (Spice Girls song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Holler (Spice Girls song) has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 8, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Very weird edit:
Someone overwrote the previous article about a purported god from Norse mythology with this un-wikified text. I think the god is bogus so don't bother creating a disambiguation page. - Haukurth 23:32, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
True: Holler is really a Norse God according to these pages. http://www.musesrealm.net/norse/gods.html http://www.pantheon.org/articles/h/holler.html manojar 07:46, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Manojar
If it was not released in the USA, how did it get a position in the US chart? Astrotrain 21:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
In Chisholm's solo room, the wood does not become a python. Close to the end of the video there is a snake on the wood and this snake transforms into a python.
Johnnyboytoy ( talk) 15:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved Kotniski ( talk) 13:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Holler →
Holler (Spice Girls song) — I do not believe that we can conclusively determine a primary topic for this title. There are too many possible meanings.
Powers
T 00:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Holler (Spice Girls song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Garnet-Septagon ( talk · contribs) 15:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm going to be reviewing this article as per the
WP:GACR. Apologies for the delay in someone getting around to taking a look at it.
For this section I'm looking at the revision as of 12:02, 20 June 2023
Passed Not a long way from meeting any of the GA criteria
Passed All media is CC licenced or has a thorough fair-use rationale
Passed No cleanup tags
Passed Stable
Passed No previous GA nomination
For this section I'm looking at the revision as of 12:02, 20 June 2023
Spotchecks are a GA requirement; I'll pick a few citations and check to see that the source correctly supports the citation.
Sources are all reliable, mostly music magazines and news outlets.
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Broadly very good, I'll continue with the review and leave these to be addressed alongside my comments below.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All below issues Fixed Garnet-Septagon ( talk) 17:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC) A few notes on wording/citations: