![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Entire article might constitute WP:OR and certainly doesn't meet WP:V. -- King of the Arverni ( talk) 20:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
so there's a large section on the sexual bans in the bible, but nothing on the lists of what you can't eat? nothing about gleaning? could we get an equal level of detail here please? Sompm ( talk) 06:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Some think it's for everyone, some for Christians, some for jews, some for the Levite people only... so which is it? -- Jules.LT ( talk) 17:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
This entire section should be deleted. There is no "modern view" of Leviticus; modern views of Leviticus are many, varied, and contradictory -- unless you want to make the case that the Gerrer Rebbe, the Pope, Pat Robertson, the Dalai Lama, and Richard Dawkins all hold the same view. The single view presented as the modern view is unattributed, leaving the reader with no indication of whose view it is or the rationale for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScenicHeights ( talk • contribs) 03:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
While there is a lot of evidence that sexually transmitted diseases have been around long before Leviticus was written, it's unlikely that the motive for the rules in Leviticus are the prevention of them as they likely didn't understand how they were transmitted. It's more likely that "these diseases were considered a divine punishment" [1]. If that sounds incorrect, I think a citation is needed to justify the statement as it's currently written. Thirdwaver ( talk) 06:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Entire article might constitute WP:OR and certainly doesn't meet WP:V. -- King of the Arverni ( talk) 20:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
so there's a large section on the sexual bans in the bible, but nothing on the lists of what you can't eat? nothing about gleaning? could we get an equal level of detail here please? Sompm ( talk) 06:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Some think it's for everyone, some for Christians, some for jews, some for the Levite people only... so which is it? -- Jules.LT ( talk) 17:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
This entire section should be deleted. There is no "modern view" of Leviticus; modern views of Leviticus are many, varied, and contradictory -- unless you want to make the case that the Gerrer Rebbe, the Pope, Pat Robertson, the Dalai Lama, and Richard Dawkins all hold the same view. The single view presented as the modern view is unattributed, leaving the reader with no indication of whose view it is or the rationale for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScenicHeights ( talk • contribs) 03:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
While there is a lot of evidence that sexually transmitted diseases have been around long before Leviticus was written, it's unlikely that the motive for the rules in Leviticus are the prevention of them as they likely didn't understand how they were transmitted. It's more likely that "these diseases were considered a divine punishment" [1]. If that sounds incorrect, I think a citation is needed to justify the statement as it's currently written. Thirdwaver ( talk) 06:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
References