This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have not read the Volokh book cited to support the notion that this case was the first time the Brandenburg test had been passed, but I am highly skeptical that he made such a claim. Two important reasons:
I realize secondary sources are preferred, but when a secondary source that is not easily obtainable makes an argument that seems to directly contradict the primary source, I think it presents doubt as to (1) if the secondary source has been accurately described, and (2) whether such a claim should be placed in the lead (or whether, assuming the secondary source description is accurate, Volokh's interpretation should be mentioned in some sort of "reaction" section), -- 2604:2000:14C5:8A67:4817:96CF:3760:FC9E ( talk) 18:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have not read the Volokh book cited to support the notion that this case was the first time the Brandenburg test had been passed, but I am highly skeptical that he made such a claim. Two important reasons:
I realize secondary sources are preferred, but when a secondary source that is not easily obtainable makes an argument that seems to directly contradict the primary source, I think it presents doubt as to (1) if the secondary source has been accurately described, and (2) whether such a claim should be placed in the lead (or whether, assuming the secondary source description is accurate, Volokh's interpretation should be mentioned in some sort of "reaction" section), -- 2604:2000:14C5:8A67:4817:96CF:3760:FC9E ( talk) 18:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)