This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This really is trivia with no place on WP. Rich Farmbrough 17:13 26 August 2006 (GMT).
What have I done? I have just reverted the edits by His Royal Highness Ohconfucius removing the Mission part, dubbing it a "copyright violation" and "promotional", and kindly commanding us not to reinsert it! Disregarding that, I reinserted it nonetheless, not just because my girlfriend has just left me and I have nothing else to do but to seek to anger His Royal Highness, Ohconfucius. In my amazement, I did not find my backyard ruined by a meteor. Despite the fact that reason is virtually non-existent in such an absolute monarchy, I still find myself offering my poor soul an excuse or two to comfort my shattered self-dignity.
Why the hell did I do it? What was I thinking, to reinsert a whole section that is obviously a copyright violation and, miraculously, but no doubt, promotional at the same time? Littered with Traditional Chinese characters, yes, you fool, Aranherunar, you have just reinserted a section obviously written by a Taiwan agent - maybe even the great Chen Shuibian himself! Run, before the Commies catch you! You have just reinserted a whole paragraph, full of copyrighted English words! Yes! You should be sentenced to thirty years in prison, no chance of parole! And all the while, don't ever THINK about reinserting the section again! Shit! Does Shakespeare have a lawyer? Aran| heru| nar 06:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
The rant of a madman? or hopeless eccentric?, or just an attempt at sarcasm? I'll leave the community to judge. Many wikipedia editors believe the mission statement is promotional. please take this discussion to WP:SCH. Ohconfucius 05:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I have once again removed the controversial material which 2 editors keep on re-inserting in the article, and very recently here in the talk page. The material is inadequately sourced, not relevant, and at best an attack on individuals who may or may not be dead. There are now WP:3RR warnings on talk pages of both users. Ohconfucius ( talk) 04:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I have again removed some defamatory material from the Talk page, under the WP:BLP policy. Please be aware that Wikipedia takes this extremely seriously. Consider this an admin warning for all the participants on this article. We are prepared to block anyone who inserts unsourced defamatory material either to the article or the Talk page. The matter has already been reviewed at WP:AN/3RR and is even now being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. EdJohnston ( talk) 13:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This really is trivia with no place on WP. Rich Farmbrough 17:13 26 August 2006 (GMT).
What have I done? I have just reverted the edits by His Royal Highness Ohconfucius removing the Mission part, dubbing it a "copyright violation" and "promotional", and kindly commanding us not to reinsert it! Disregarding that, I reinserted it nonetheless, not just because my girlfriend has just left me and I have nothing else to do but to seek to anger His Royal Highness, Ohconfucius. In my amazement, I did not find my backyard ruined by a meteor. Despite the fact that reason is virtually non-existent in such an absolute monarchy, I still find myself offering my poor soul an excuse or two to comfort my shattered self-dignity.
Why the hell did I do it? What was I thinking, to reinsert a whole section that is obviously a copyright violation and, miraculously, but no doubt, promotional at the same time? Littered with Traditional Chinese characters, yes, you fool, Aranherunar, you have just reinserted a section obviously written by a Taiwan agent - maybe even the great Chen Shuibian himself! Run, before the Commies catch you! You have just reinserted a whole paragraph, full of copyrighted English words! Yes! You should be sentenced to thirty years in prison, no chance of parole! And all the while, don't ever THINK about reinserting the section again! Shit! Does Shakespeare have a lawyer? Aran| heru| nar 06:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
The rant of a madman? or hopeless eccentric?, or just an attempt at sarcasm? I'll leave the community to judge. Many wikipedia editors believe the mission statement is promotional. please take this discussion to WP:SCH. Ohconfucius 05:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I have once again removed the controversial material which 2 editors keep on re-inserting in the article, and very recently here in the talk page. The material is inadequately sourced, not relevant, and at best an attack on individuals who may or may not be dead. There are now WP:3RR warnings on talk pages of both users. Ohconfucius ( talk) 04:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
I have again removed some defamatory material from the Talk page, under the WP:BLP policy. Please be aware that Wikipedia takes this extremely seriously. Consider this an admin warning for all the participants on this article. We are prepared to block anyone who inserts unsourced defamatory material either to the article or the Talk page. The matter has already been reviewed at WP:AN/3RR and is even now being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. EdJohnston ( talk) 13:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)