![]() | Hohokum has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 7, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Hohokum appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Will have this one to you by the weekend. ☠
Jag
uar ☠
16:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is generally a well written and well structured article. It is broad, comprehensive and gets straight to the point. The reception section is also in depth and has no problems (please tell me your secret). In conclusion the only major concern I have is the structure of the lead as it doesn't appear to clearly state the release date, publisher and seems short despite it summarises the article well. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until those issues have been addressed. Thank you. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 17:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt improvements, the article now definitely meets the GA criteria. Well done ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Why does the term Frobisher Says redirect to this page? The only similarity between the two games is the developer.
![]() | Hohokum has been listed as one of the
Video games good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 7, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Hohokum appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Will have this one to you by the weekend. ☠
Jag
uar ☠
16:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is generally a well written and well structured article. It is broad, comprehensive and gets straight to the point. The reception section is also in depth and has no problems (please tell me your secret). In conclusion the only major concern I have is the structure of the lead as it doesn't appear to clearly state the release date, publisher and seems short despite it summarises the article well. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until those issues have been addressed. Thank you. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 17:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt improvements, the article now definitely meets the GA criteria. Well done ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Why does the term Frobisher Says redirect to this page? The only similarity between the two games is the developer.