This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hogganfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I rather enjoyed reading the content removed by User:Blairtummock. Details of exactly how various sections of the settlement were built seem entirely relevant. Even the comments about the types of brick used appeal to my interest in architectural decisions. (Clearly the inline link was not per MoS.
I'd be interested in the opinions of others as to the reinstatement of this detail. -- Tagishsimon (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia's guidelines are relevant, reference-able, compact and to the point. This is a wiki, one person does not own or control what is written. My suggestion is that you write your own details about Hogganfield, write it clearly and make it relevant.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hogganfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hogganfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I rather enjoyed reading the content removed by User:Blairtummock. Details of exactly how various sections of the settlement were built seem entirely relevant. Even the comments about the types of brick used appeal to my interest in architectural decisions. (Clearly the inline link was not per MoS.
I'd be interested in the opinions of others as to the reinstatement of this detail. -- Tagishsimon (talk) 12:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia's guidelines are relevant, reference-able, compact and to the point. This is a wiki, one person does not own or control what is written. My suggestion is that you write your own details about Hogganfield, write it clearly and make it relevant.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hogganfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)