This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hochelega is a mispelling of Hochelaga. Please change.
--The Mohawk are a tribe within the Iroquois Confederacy/Haudenosaunee. Thus Mohawk = Iroquois. According to the St. Lawrence Iroquoians article, it seems that this group was not Iroquois, as in the Confederacy, but culturally Irqouoian--speaking an Iroquoian Language ( Laurentian) similar to Mohawk and others, and living in longhouses like the Iroquois.
The tone of this article needs to be re-evaluated. It was clearly written by someone with a poor grasp of the English language, as there are several issues with tense. The introduction, in particular, is poorly written.
i agree. it comes off as having been translated from a french document, probably by someone who's first langauage is french. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.41.88.154 ( talk) 14:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I removed the following from the Bibliography and Sources section because it doesn't belong there and it appears to be contradictory and/or irrelevant to the article. Perhaps another editor can decide whether any of it is worth incorporating:
PK T(alk) 18:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hochelaga (village)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "area_and_pop_city_proper":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hochelaga (village). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hochelaga (village). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hochelega is a mispelling of Hochelaga. Please change.
--The Mohawk are a tribe within the Iroquois Confederacy/Haudenosaunee. Thus Mohawk = Iroquois. According to the St. Lawrence Iroquoians article, it seems that this group was not Iroquois, as in the Confederacy, but culturally Irqouoian--speaking an Iroquoian Language ( Laurentian) similar to Mohawk and others, and living in longhouses like the Iroquois.
The tone of this article needs to be re-evaluated. It was clearly written by someone with a poor grasp of the English language, as there are several issues with tense. The introduction, in particular, is poorly written.
i agree. it comes off as having been translated from a french document, probably by someone who's first langauage is french. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.41.88.154 ( talk) 14:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I removed the following from the Bibliography and Sources section because it doesn't belong there and it appears to be contradictory and/or irrelevant to the article. Perhaps another editor can decide whether any of it is worth incorporating:
PK T(alk) 18:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hochelaga (village)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "area_and_pop_city_proper":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hochelaga (village). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hochelaga (village). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)