This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hobart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
Greetings,
I have restructured the article a bit to bring it closer to the style used on the
Sydney page.
Main reason is that I want to add a section on healthcare, but adding yet another major section of r a few lines of text seems weird. I believe that the page looks better with the new grouping now, and this style is also used for other Australian cities like Sydney.
But feel free to disagree, I'm relatively new here on Wikipedia and not sure how much I may change without asking for consensus.
LordPeterII (
talk)
14:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Aboriginal names describing a region are not applicable when used in conjunction with hobart, which is a city. A city is: "an inhabited place of greater size, population, or importance than a town or village." notice the definition changes due to the amount of infrastructure/buildings/population etc when compared to a village or town. A city is not defined by a region name. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
27.32.1.85 (
talk) 05:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC) [sock comments struck through.
Drmies (
talk)
02:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
[sock comments removed: Drmies ( talk) 02:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Hobart Function & Conference Centre and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Hobart Function & Conference Centre until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
A7V2 (
talk)
07:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Starting section so that editors who wish to do so may present arguments for altering the WP:STATUSQUO in the article, specifically, removing the alternative name from the first sentence. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 02:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hobart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
Greetings,
I have restructured the article a bit to bring it closer to the style used on the
Sydney page.
Main reason is that I want to add a section on healthcare, but adding yet another major section of r a few lines of text seems weird. I believe that the page looks better with the new grouping now, and this style is also used for other Australian cities like Sydney.
But feel free to disagree, I'm relatively new here on Wikipedia and not sure how much I may change without asking for consensus.
LordPeterII (
talk)
14:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Aboriginal names describing a region are not applicable when used in conjunction with hobart, which is a city. A city is: "an inhabited place of greater size, population, or importance than a town or village." notice the definition changes due to the amount of infrastructure/buildings/population etc when compared to a village or town. A city is not defined by a region name. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
27.32.1.85 (
talk) 05:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC) [sock comments struck through.
Drmies (
talk)
02:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
[sock comments removed: Drmies ( talk) 02:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Hobart Function & Conference Centre and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Hobart Function & Conference Centre until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
A7V2 (
talk)
07:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Starting section so that editors who wish to do so may present arguments for altering the WP:STATUSQUO in the article, specifically, removing the alternative name from the first sentence. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 02:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)