![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus, due to inconsistent styling. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 15:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Ho Mobile → ho-mobile – correct name; renamed without WP:CONS 2A01:E11:1A:990:C48D:248E:171A:8787 ( talk) 10:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
ho. Mobileand a tendency to
ho Mobile. The former is definitely out because the full stop mark creates a significant issue of readability. WP:TSC would advise us to avoid this too.
ho Mobilemight be considered an alternative. However, I am not convinced that this tendency to lowercase ho is sufficient to override the inherent readability of standard casing (eg Ho). If adopted, there is also the issue of readability if placed at the start of a sentence and whether it should be capitalised in such a case. There is no search issue arising from using Ho instead of ho that might otherwise justify using ho. Cinderella157 ( talk) 02:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The former [ho. Mobile] is definitely out because the full stop mark creates a significant issue of readability. WP:TSC would advise us to avoid this too.Cinderella157 ( talk) 07:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 ( talk) 17:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: not moved. Still consensus to use WP:TITLETM's clause regarding lack of consistent stylization. Favonian ( talk) 10:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus, due to inconsistent styling. ( closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky ( talk) 15:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Ho Mobile → ho-mobile – correct name; renamed without WP:CONS 2A01:E11:1A:990:C48D:248E:171A:8787 ( talk) 10:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Jenks24 ( talk) 10:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
ho. Mobileand a tendency to
ho Mobile. The former is definitely out because the full stop mark creates a significant issue of readability. WP:TSC would advise us to avoid this too.
ho Mobilemight be considered an alternative. However, I am not convinced that this tendency to lowercase ho is sufficient to override the inherent readability of standard casing (eg Ho). If adopted, there is also the issue of readability if placed at the start of a sentence and whether it should be capitalised in such a case. There is no search issue arising from using Ho instead of ho that might otherwise justify using ho. Cinderella157 ( talk) 02:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The former [ho. Mobile] is definitely out because the full stop mark creates a significant issue of readability. WP:TSC would advise us to avoid this too.Cinderella157 ( talk) 07:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 ( talk) 17:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: not moved. Still consensus to use WP:TITLETM's clause regarding lack of consistent stylization. Favonian ( talk) 10:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
References