This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ho Chi Minh Thought article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ho Chi Minh Thought. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
S1d6arrett23 ( talk) 03:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Anyway, digression over, page expanded, do-do-do. 2600:6C40:7100:3DDD:D82D:CB11:F95C:B631 ( talk) 05:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I have cleaned up some of the inconsistencies in language and grammar, and I believe the copy edit warning can be removed.
The section on Ideology could still do with some work though. The translated list of bullet points is still not quite right stylistically. More importantly, this same section jumps from a 1950s quote from Ho Chin Minh, to discussion at the 2011 Congress. A more detailed article would go into more depth on how the ideology developed in the times innbetween that Xcia0069 ( talk) 19:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ho Chi Minh Thought article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ho Chi Minh Thought. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
S1d6arrett23 ( talk) 03:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Anyway, digression over, page expanded, do-do-do. 2600:6C40:7100:3DDD:D82D:CB11:F95C:B631 ( talk) 05:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I have cleaned up some of the inconsistencies in language and grammar, and I believe the copy edit warning can be removed.
The section on Ideology could still do with some work though. The translated list of bullet points is still not quite right stylistically. More importantly, this same section jumps from a 1950s quote from Ho Chin Minh, to discussion at the 2011 Congress. A more detailed article would go into more depth on how the ideology developed in the times innbetween that Xcia0069 ( talk) 19:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)