![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently working on this draft. Please let me know if anyone wants to collaborate. Will take me a few days to complete this. Will update when I am finally done. NotJuggerNot ( talk) 20:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey again @ NotJuggerNot:, I wanted to touch base with you here, as you have confirmed your interest in improving this article, and I am interested in helping you reach this goal. As for an image, this article really only needs one. I'll leave the decision up to you, but my recommendation is that you use the image of the logo in the Pakistan Super League article, which gets the job done. As for an example of what you can look to, I would use Nevill Ground as an example of a Good Article. While it has existed for a substantially longer time than the Pakistan Super League, there is a lot to take away from it. For one, it covers only the largest events rather than giving a season by season recap, which is what you currently have. I really think that you can get rid of the "2016", "2017", "2018" etc. sections. While these events have happened, the inclusion of every recap starts to become borderline indiscriminate, and not what we are looking for in a Good Article. Instead of focusing on the things that happened every year, make sure you really focus on the things that changed every year, and have good sources for these events. The "Establishment and launch" section and the "Controversies" section are pretty spot on, and I can't think of anything you need to change there. The biggest thing for you right now is to rethink your "Season by season overview" section. This is the heart of the article, but it's a lot of unnecessary information. Focus less on the individual teams competing, and write about the actual League itself and the changes that have occurred over the years.
With that being said, let me know if you have any questions. That was a lot to take in, but your article is on track to becoming a Good Article. After you address the overview, there is some things I want to address with the "Revenue" section, and that should be all you need before we can submit it! Good luck! Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently working on this draft. Please let me know if anyone wants to collaborate. Will take me a few days to complete this. Will update when I am finally done. NotJuggerNot ( talk) 20:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Hey again @ NotJuggerNot:, I wanted to touch base with you here, as you have confirmed your interest in improving this article, and I am interested in helping you reach this goal. As for an image, this article really only needs one. I'll leave the decision up to you, but my recommendation is that you use the image of the logo in the Pakistan Super League article, which gets the job done. As for an example of what you can look to, I would use Nevill Ground as an example of a Good Article. While it has existed for a substantially longer time than the Pakistan Super League, there is a lot to take away from it. For one, it covers only the largest events rather than giving a season by season recap, which is what you currently have. I really think that you can get rid of the "2016", "2017", "2018" etc. sections. While these events have happened, the inclusion of every recap starts to become borderline indiscriminate, and not what we are looking for in a Good Article. Instead of focusing on the things that happened every year, make sure you really focus on the things that changed every year, and have good sources for these events. The "Establishment and launch" section and the "Controversies" section are pretty spot on, and I can't think of anything you need to change there. The biggest thing for you right now is to rethink your "Season by season overview" section. This is the heart of the article, but it's a lot of unnecessary information. Focus less on the individual teams competing, and write about the actual League itself and the changes that have occurred over the years.
With that being said, let me know if you have any questions. That was a lot to take in, but your article is on track to becoming a Good Article. After you address the overview, there is some things I want to address with the "Revenue" section, and that should be all you need before we can submit it! Good luck! Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)