This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of the Jaffna Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Jaffna Kingdom was copied or moved into Early history of Jaffna kingdom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This is regarding an to the removal of a tomfoolery paragraph from the article matched with dubious sources.
The links to the three sources are: [1], [2], [3].
None of the three sources, has any reputation accurate nor verification in dealing with topics regarding medieval history. The first and the third are nothing much more than views of two unknown folks and the second is clearly stated as an OPINION at the bottom of the page and not a fact of matter or anything else.
Moreover all the three sources are by pro- Sinhalese authors have seemed to excessively relied upon extremely opinionated and questionable myths like the Mahavamsa and a single dubious inscription to quote their statements.
The three sources never mind what they are discussing(ultimately all three being Sinhala heritage) use only one dubious inscription unearthed from an ancient Tamil-Buddhist hamlet as the sole basis to air their opinionated views.
These claims are thoroughly contradicted and disproved by the four references we have in the article: [1] [2] [3] [4].
Nāga Nadu(The Kingdom of Nagas) was an autonomous administrative entity of the Tamil Kingdom and Vallipuram, Kandarodai, Maanthai were ancient centers of Tamil Buddhism much prior to the development of Buddhism among the Sinhalese.So that absolutely rules out any possibility of the
Jaffna Kingdom coming under any Sinhalese rule. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Coppercholride (
talk •
contribs)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
History of the Jaffna Kingdom. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of the Jaffna Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Jaffna Kingdom was copied or moved into Early history of Jaffna kingdom with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This is regarding an to the removal of a tomfoolery paragraph from the article matched with dubious sources.
The links to the three sources are: [1], [2], [3].
None of the three sources, has any reputation accurate nor verification in dealing with topics regarding medieval history. The first and the third are nothing much more than views of two unknown folks and the second is clearly stated as an OPINION at the bottom of the page and not a fact of matter or anything else.
Moreover all the three sources are by pro- Sinhalese authors have seemed to excessively relied upon extremely opinionated and questionable myths like the Mahavamsa and a single dubious inscription to quote their statements.
The three sources never mind what they are discussing(ultimately all three being Sinhala heritage) use only one dubious inscription unearthed from an ancient Tamil-Buddhist hamlet as the sole basis to air their opinionated views.
These claims are thoroughly contradicted and disproved by the four references we have in the article: [1] [2] [3] [4].
Nāga Nadu(The Kingdom of Nagas) was an autonomous administrative entity of the Tamil Kingdom and Vallipuram, Kandarodai, Maanthai were ancient centers of Tamil Buddhism much prior to the development of Buddhism among the Sinhalese.So that absolutely rules out any possibility of the
Jaffna Kingdom coming under any Sinhalese rule. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Coppercholride (
talk •
contribs)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
History of the Jaffna Kingdom. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)