This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose renaming this article Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy to better reflect the conventional English rendition of dansk-norsk. // Big Adamsky 14:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Rather than reverting your decision to remove the category:hisotry of norway designation, I'll sak here first. What is your logic? Tusen takk - Williamborg 02:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
How many percent of different regions/nationalities must be documented some where, or just believed by a trusted historian. Since there is no source provided, i revert Berig's edit. -- Dynamiske ( talk) 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Two massive sources – not just for this article but also for all the affiliate ship articles – are the Orlogsmuseet's ship-by-ship history pages and this compendium of Danish ships from prehistory to the 1690s. Of course, both of them are in (in Danish), but what would you expect? — LlywelynII 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The latest (undiscussed) move from Dano-Norwegian navy was a slighty improvement in my view, but I think we should have a discussion on what to actually call the article. There seems to be somewhat of an undue focus on the loss of Norway. I don't see that it actually became a new organization, just like the Swedish Navy didn't suddenly change because by losing Finland (or gaining Norway).
So why use complicated and speculative backronyms? Why not settle for something intuitive like history of the Danish navy?
Peter Isotalo 19:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Danish navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hallo everybody!
Rather than a long list of ships names in this article, why not just give links to those ships which have Wiki-articles (i.e. blue links). There are two superb external sources which I use a lot, and which are on my User page but which I repeat here. Both originate from the website of the Royal Danish Naval Museum
For record cards of individual ships (where they exist) or just the names listed alphabetically
Of course, each complete ship's wiki-article is probably listed in the
Category:Ships of the Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy
Would this make this Danish Navy article easier to follow?? Comments??
Viking1808 (
talk) 11:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose renaming this article Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy to better reflect the conventional English rendition of dansk-norsk. // Big Adamsky 14:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Rather than reverting your decision to remove the category:hisotry of norway designation, I'll sak here first. What is your logic? Tusen takk - Williamborg 02:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
How many percent of different regions/nationalities must be documented some where, or just believed by a trusted historian. Since there is no source provided, i revert Berig's edit. -- Dynamiske ( talk) 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Two massive sources – not just for this article but also for all the affiliate ship articles – are the Orlogsmuseet's ship-by-ship history pages and this compendium of Danish ships from prehistory to the 1690s. Of course, both of them are in (in Danish), but what would you expect? — LlywelynII 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The latest (undiscussed) move from Dano-Norwegian navy was a slighty improvement in my view, but I think we should have a discussion on what to actually call the article. There seems to be somewhat of an undue focus on the loss of Norway. I don't see that it actually became a new organization, just like the Swedish Navy didn't suddenly change because by losing Finland (or gaining Norway).
So why use complicated and speculative backronyms? Why not settle for something intuitive like history of the Danish navy?
Peter Isotalo 19:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Danish navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hallo everybody!
Rather than a long list of ships names in this article, why not just give links to those ships which have Wiki-articles (i.e. blue links). There are two superb external sources which I use a lot, and which are on my User page but which I repeat here. Both originate from the website of the Royal Danish Naval Museum
For record cards of individual ships (where they exist) or just the names listed alphabetically
Of course, each complete ship's wiki-article is probably listed in the
Category:Ships of the Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy
Would this make this Danish Navy article easier to follow?? Comments??
Viking1808 (
talk) 11:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)