This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mathematics Low‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale. Philosophy: Logic / Science / Mind / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Logic Philosophy of science Philosophy of mind Contemporary philosophy

Jeezum crow 'bot, gimme a few minutes. A person's gotta start somewhere! I've linked the page, and entered some stuff. wvbailey Wvbailey 18:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Based on the work done on the article thus far, I don't think the original deletion tag applies anymore. The article still probably needs work, but shouldn't be subject to speedy deletion. -- Bfigura ^{( talk)} 20:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Gandy and Sieg etc. are actually using this "computor" to make a distinction, although I find it very confusing, myself. I can't remember whether a "computor" is a human-as-computer or is it a "computer"? -- i.e. the old use of the word from Turing's time ("computer" was a person who cranked numbers at a desk calculator). wvbailey Wvbailey 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Shouldn't László Kalmár's argument be mentioned? Kalmar, L. 1959. 'An Argument Against the Plausibility of Church's Thesis'. In Heyting, A. (ed.) 1959. Constructivity in Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp.72-80. Kope ( talk) 13:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm not familiar with it. It would be an interesting addition; if you are familiar with it, go ahead and add it. Bill Wvbailey ( talk) 15:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC) reply

For discussion of the material on concurrency, please see [1]. — Carl ( CBM ·  talk) 23:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC) reply