This article's edit history is not complete. Some of the article text's edit history exists at a different location due to copying and pasting between articles. |
This article's edit history includes a copy-paste-without-attribution. This took place on 8 June 2006 and can be seen here. The copied text originally came from History of Greek and Roman Egypt. It was removed on 8 June 2006 with this edit, and the earlier edit history for that copied text can be seen at that page's edit history. Please see Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:How to break up a page for details of when such copying and pasting is acceptable and when it is not, and how to correctly attribute using links in the edit summaries. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We need an emmidiate template with years (305 BC-30 BC) and a nice map for this one. I can contribute with materials but I am very poor with technical stuff. Please consider this, a template like "Inca Empire" or "Roman Republic" with a map an so.
The first dat that shows up, 125 BC is wrong--Alexander the great was in Egypt around 330 BC
This change was made back in May 2006 at History of Greek and Roman Egypt. The text was since moved to Ptolemaic Egypt, but the important point is that nomarch was correct, and monarch was incorrect. I have now changed things so they are correct again. Please can anyone watching the article ensure that a similar well-intentioned mistake is not made in the future. Carcharoth 08:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
The section under Basilikon Agemata is confusingly formatted and written. Should someone do something about this or flag it?
A large chunk of this article (Namely, all of the portions discussing the Ptolemaic Army) is lifted from the unit descriptions of the Ptolemaioi army for Europa Barbarorum, a mod for the PC game Rome: Total War. This probably should be corrected. The lifted text can originally be found here: http://europabarbarorum.com/factions_ptolemaioi_units.html Swordwraith 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Why in this article is possible to use two systems ( BC/AD and BCE/CE)? I have been trying to change all of those to BC/AD because most of dates in this article is like that, but Heiro nickname is deleting all of those because its religious poin of veiw (not-theistic). When it is the opposite its good for media elite and they let us to do that (I have done that too). But now no because BC means before Christ. This is clear double standard from wikipedia media elite. Shame on you. You are not logical at all. This empirical test of mine is part of Wikipedia media discussion and anti bias programme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.92.31 ( talk) 11:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid "Ptolemaic Egypt" is not an appropriate title for the subject here discussed (with such a title, the article should typically deal with all the things occurring in Egypt under the Ptolemies: agriculture, life of the people etc...). The content however is clearly about the Ptolemaic Empire (or, maybe Kingdom), which by the way did not limit itself to Egypt (parts of the Levant were also protion of Ptolemaic territories). Similarly, other articles on the Diadocri have dynastic rather than geographic names ("Seleucid Empire", rather than "Seleucid Persia" for example). I suggest the article be renamed accordingly. Regards. PHG 16:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Small corrections also to the specific paragraph since the dominant group and culture in Ptolemaic Egypt was Greek and not only Greco-Macedonian. ( Seleukosa 10:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC))
This entry reads strangely like a narrative, with questions and all. Is that generally accepted for an encyclopedic entry?
the jewish section is interesting but it needs sources, BADLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurian Legend ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Im disbuting the neutrality of the contributions section it seem the author wrote a biased section the title says contributions but the only positive thing it says they build buildings,it s very suspect and will be removed in short order unless somebody has a problem and would like to to dispute my claims,but i think it is pretty obvious that it is bacisly a criticims section that is called contributions,-- Mikmik2953 16:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
This article had also discussed about Alexander the Great, while Alexander belonged to Macedonia. So I support to rename the article as History of Greek Egypt. 98.119.177.171 ( talk) 19:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Can someone correct this (so it is consistant)
Alexandra the Great
XsandaOS (
talk) 19:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
There is significant content overlap between this article and the Ptolemaic Kingdom article, both of which cover the exact same topic. Therefore, a merger is a natural step. However, since both articles are well-developed with significant edit histories, conducting the merger may be tricky, so technical assistance may be needed. -- BomBom ( talk) 15:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
This article's edit history is not complete. Some of the article text's edit history exists at a different location due to copying and pasting between articles. |
This article's edit history includes a copy-paste-without-attribution. This took place on 8 June 2006 and can be seen here. The copied text originally came from History of Greek and Roman Egypt. It was removed on 8 June 2006 with this edit, and the earlier edit history for that copied text can be seen at that page's edit history. Please see Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:How to break up a page for details of when such copying and pasting is acceptable and when it is not, and how to correctly attribute using links in the edit summaries. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We need an emmidiate template with years (305 BC-30 BC) and a nice map for this one. I can contribute with materials but I am very poor with technical stuff. Please consider this, a template like "Inca Empire" or "Roman Republic" with a map an so.
The first dat that shows up, 125 BC is wrong--Alexander the great was in Egypt around 330 BC
This change was made back in May 2006 at History of Greek and Roman Egypt. The text was since moved to Ptolemaic Egypt, but the important point is that nomarch was correct, and monarch was incorrect. I have now changed things so they are correct again. Please can anyone watching the article ensure that a similar well-intentioned mistake is not made in the future. Carcharoth 08:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
The section under Basilikon Agemata is confusingly formatted and written. Should someone do something about this or flag it?
A large chunk of this article (Namely, all of the portions discussing the Ptolemaic Army) is lifted from the unit descriptions of the Ptolemaioi army for Europa Barbarorum, a mod for the PC game Rome: Total War. This probably should be corrected. The lifted text can originally be found here: http://europabarbarorum.com/factions_ptolemaioi_units.html Swordwraith 20:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Why in this article is possible to use two systems ( BC/AD and BCE/CE)? I have been trying to change all of those to BC/AD because most of dates in this article is like that, but Heiro nickname is deleting all of those because its religious poin of veiw (not-theistic). When it is the opposite its good for media elite and they let us to do that (I have done that too). But now no because BC means before Christ. This is clear double standard from wikipedia media elite. Shame on you. You are not logical at all. This empirical test of mine is part of Wikipedia media discussion and anti bias programme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.92.31 ( talk) 11:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
I am afraid "Ptolemaic Egypt" is not an appropriate title for the subject here discussed (with such a title, the article should typically deal with all the things occurring in Egypt under the Ptolemies: agriculture, life of the people etc...). The content however is clearly about the Ptolemaic Empire (or, maybe Kingdom), which by the way did not limit itself to Egypt (parts of the Levant were also protion of Ptolemaic territories). Similarly, other articles on the Diadocri have dynastic rather than geographic names ("Seleucid Empire", rather than "Seleucid Persia" for example). I suggest the article be renamed accordingly. Regards. PHG 16:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Small corrections also to the specific paragraph since the dominant group and culture in Ptolemaic Egypt was Greek and not only Greco-Macedonian. ( Seleukosa 10:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC))
This entry reads strangely like a narrative, with questions and all. Is that generally accepted for an encyclopedic entry?
the jewish section is interesting but it needs sources, BADLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurian Legend ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Im disbuting the neutrality of the contributions section it seem the author wrote a biased section the title says contributions but the only positive thing it says they build buildings,it s very suspect and will be removed in short order unless somebody has a problem and would like to to dispute my claims,but i think it is pretty obvious that it is bacisly a criticims section that is called contributions,-- Mikmik2953 16:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
This article had also discussed about Alexander the Great, while Alexander belonged to Macedonia. So I support to rename the article as History of Greek Egypt. 98.119.177.171 ( talk) 19:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Can someone correct this (so it is consistant)
Alexandra the Great
XsandaOS (
talk) 19:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
There is significant content overlap between this article and the Ptolemaic Kingdom article, both of which cover the exact same topic. Therefore, a merger is a natural step. However, since both articles are well-developed with significant edit histories, conducting the merger may be tricky, so technical assistance may be needed. -- BomBom ( talk) 15:39, 9 March 2011 (UTC)