Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aiken drum ( talk · contribs)

I will be reviewing this article for GA status. Aiken D 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   'Bridges drove into Commerce in his buggy' - link buggy.
   Commerce is a long section - consider splitting into a subsection under Curriculum?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This is looking excellent - just a couple of tiny quibbles but not dealbreaking. Well done. Aiken D 14:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Aiken D! I've made the changes you suggest, which are certainly improvements. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help pass this article. Michael Barera ( talk) 17:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply