This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was the area "uninhabited" (by Europeans) until the 1600s? If the Spanish occupied the rest of Central America, why was Belize excepted? Brutannica 01:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
The article contains the sentence "The British army continues to man bases in South America." Should this say "The British army continues to man bases in Belize." Belize is not in South America.-- HarryHenryGebel 16:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't see the relevance of the factoid, even if it is meant to say "Belize", as opposed to South America. This article is about Belizean history, not the British army. DO56 ( talk) 20:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Who keeps changing "Belize" to "our country Belize"? That's not very professional. DO56 21:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Curious why the local Garifuna holiday "Settlement Day" (Nov 19) isn't in the section titled "Emigration of the Garifuna." The whole town of Dagringa came alive yestderday, as well as "Settlement Day Eve" on (Nov 18). [1] -redsai 190.197.37.139 ( talk) 16:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
In the 2nd paragraph of the heading, there is a sentence that begins with "Great Britain first sent an official Mrs.Hollis· to the area in the late 17th century...". There is no citation given. Who is Mrs. Hollis? Was this injected somewhere along the way and simply not accurate? I've spent a reasonable amount of time trying to find any information about this person but have had no luck, and given that it seems unlikely that an official British official from the 17th century would be a woman, I suspect that it is a fake reference. Also, there is an extra space after the name and the sentence flows better without it, which further makes it seem spurious. wcmaney 12:10, 11 November 2016
Why is this article have the Culture of Belize sidebar / side-box in the lead? I don't see how that's relevant to have (maybe for an article oncultural history it would be appropriate, but this article rather covers general history)... Asdfjrjjj ( talk) 06:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
contributions to belizean culture 45.70.241.5 ( talk) 19:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was the area "uninhabited" (by Europeans) until the 1600s? If the Spanish occupied the rest of Central America, why was Belize excepted? Brutannica 01:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
The article contains the sentence "The British army continues to man bases in South America." Should this say "The British army continues to man bases in Belize." Belize is not in South America.-- HarryHenryGebel 16:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't see the relevance of the factoid, even if it is meant to say "Belize", as opposed to South America. This article is about Belizean history, not the British army. DO56 ( talk) 20:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Who keeps changing "Belize" to "our country Belize"? That's not very professional. DO56 21:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Curious why the local Garifuna holiday "Settlement Day" (Nov 19) isn't in the section titled "Emigration of the Garifuna." The whole town of Dagringa came alive yestderday, as well as "Settlement Day Eve" on (Nov 18). [1] -redsai 190.197.37.139 ( talk) 16:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
In the 2nd paragraph of the heading, there is a sentence that begins with "Great Britain first sent an official Mrs.Hollis· to the area in the late 17th century...". There is no citation given. Who is Mrs. Hollis? Was this injected somewhere along the way and simply not accurate? I've spent a reasonable amount of time trying to find any information about this person but have had no luck, and given that it seems unlikely that an official British official from the 17th century would be a woman, I suspect that it is a fake reference. Also, there is an extra space after the name and the sentence flows better without it, which further makes it seem spurious. wcmaney 12:10, 11 November 2016
Why is this article have the Culture of Belize sidebar / side-box in the lead? I don't see how that's relevant to have (maybe for an article oncultural history it would be appropriate, but this article rather covers general history)... Asdfjrjjj ( talk) 06:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
contributions to belizean culture 45.70.241.5 ( talk) 19:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)