This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi. This article has two section headings. One for "Castle". One for "Barracks".
Under the "castle" section, there is lots of content completely unrelated to the castle (bridges, etc). Ditto for the "barracks" section (stuff about workhouse, John Locke, weir, etc).
Unless someone can explain the value of these section heads, I propose reorganising the sections on different lines. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what to propose. Chronologically ordered would seem more sensible for a history article. Or, if we are to keep an arrangement where we organise on "geographical" lines (and have sections covering the history of specific buildings/structures), then at least we should add another section to cover the "other" content ("castle", "barracks", "other").
Whatever the solution, I think just about anything (including removing the section heads altogether) would be better than the current arrangement. Guliolopez ( talk) 16:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Athlone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Athlone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi. This article has two section headings. One for "Castle". One for "Barracks".
Under the "castle" section, there is lots of content completely unrelated to the castle (bridges, etc). Ditto for the "barracks" section (stuff about workhouse, John Locke, weir, etc).
Unless someone can explain the value of these section heads, I propose reorganising the sections on different lines. To be honest I'm not entirely sure what to propose. Chronologically ordered would seem more sensible for a history article. Or, if we are to keep an arrangement where we organise on "geographical" lines (and have sections covering the history of specific buildings/structures), then at least we should add another section to cover the "other" content ("castle", "barracks", "other").
Whatever the solution, I think just about anything (including removing the section heads altogether) would be better than the current arrangement. Guliolopez ( talk) 16:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Athlone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Athlone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)