This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 25, 2004, September 25, 2005, September 25, 2006, September 25, 2007, and September 25, 2008. |
Please expand the acronym "CNRA". I can't find an expansion for it on the net. Thanks! JesseW
Neither the colons nor the french governement have forbidden to the muslims to pursue graduating studies. It's not me who tells it, it's the university of Alger ( http://www.univ-alger.dz/historique.htm). It doesn't mean that the graduated would find job opportunities in Algeria, but they would have been able to replace a part of the expulsated colons. Moreover, the colons have been forced to leave by the FLN. They don't have left in order to "punish" locals, but in order to save their lifes. To my opinion, the chapter "aftermath" contains propaganda. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.121.1.26 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 17 February 2006, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.35.116.130 ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 19 February 2006
The article was originally titled History of Algeria since 1962. Some but not all content on the 90s and 2000s were removed from the article here [1], then a "temporary fix" was introduced by moving the article [2]. This had the following problems:
My suggestion is that we revert everything (the content removal and article rename), to address the above mentioned problems.-- Bxj ( talk) 10:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Algeria (1962–99). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that the last section of the "aftermath of the war" section discussion autogestion and the nationalization of resources is copy and pasted from the "country studies" source listed at the bottom of the article. Despite this, however, no quotes appear in the article and the source is not listed or cited in the references. I am also curious about the quality of this source. How do we know it is accurate/trustworthy? Is anyone here familiar with "Country Studies"? And/or is anyone willing to take on tackling this section of the article? I think it could be improved with some stronger, properly cited sources and some original wording! (also more clarity). Mmb2297 ( talk) 05:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 25, 2004, September 25, 2005, September 25, 2006, September 25, 2007, and September 25, 2008. |
Please expand the acronym "CNRA". I can't find an expansion for it on the net. Thanks! JesseW
Neither the colons nor the french governement have forbidden to the muslims to pursue graduating studies. It's not me who tells it, it's the university of Alger ( http://www.univ-alger.dz/historique.htm). It doesn't mean that the graduated would find job opportunities in Algeria, but they would have been able to replace a part of the expulsated colons. Moreover, the colons have been forced to leave by the FLN. They don't have left in order to "punish" locals, but in order to save their lifes. To my opinion, the chapter "aftermath" contains propaganda. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.121.1.26 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 17 February 2006, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.35.116.130 ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 19 February 2006
The article was originally titled History of Algeria since 1962. Some but not all content on the 90s and 2000s were removed from the article here [1], then a "temporary fix" was introduced by moving the article [2]. This had the following problems:
My suggestion is that we revert everything (the content removal and article rename), to address the above mentioned problems.-- Bxj ( talk) 10:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Algeria (1962–99). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that the last section of the "aftermath of the war" section discussion autogestion and the nationalization of resources is copy and pasted from the "country studies" source listed at the bottom of the article. Despite this, however, no quotes appear in the article and the source is not listed or cited in the references. I am also curious about the quality of this source. How do we know it is accurate/trustworthy? Is anyone here familiar with "Country Studies"? And/or is anyone willing to take on tackling this section of the article? I think it could be improved with some stronger, properly cited sources and some original wording! (also more clarity). Mmb2297 ( talk) 05:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)