From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of eruptions

This list is unsupported by any citation here, but perhaps one or more of these dates can be verified? -- Tenmei ( talk) 16:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply

  • 1707. [1]
  • 1700. -- not
  • 1627 -- not
  • 1560 -- not
  • 1511 -- not
  • 1427 -- not
  • 1083
  • 1032
  • 1017 --?
  • 999 --?
  • 993 --?
  • 952 --?
  • 937 --?
  • 932
  • 870
  • 864. [2]
  • 830
  • 826
  • 802
  • 800
  • 781
See this - Global Volcanism Programme Record of Fuji Activity Guanlongwucaii ( talk) 09:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Guanlongwucaii reply

References

  1. ^ Shikuoka University page; see Japanese Wikipedia.
  2. ^ Titsingh, p. 118.

Problem with Dates of Old Fiji, Komitake

The dates listed in the introduction are overlapping and contradict the text below. Can someone who knows the history fix this? 170.63.96.108 ( talk) 14:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Is there any verifiable information in this article at all? It seems mostly unsupported and likely original research. It seems to me there should at least be a header drawing attention to the lack of references. 76.10.165.46 ( talk) 02:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of eruptions

This list is unsupported by any citation here, but perhaps one or more of these dates can be verified? -- Tenmei ( talk) 16:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply

  • 1707. [1]
  • 1700. -- not
  • 1627 -- not
  • 1560 -- not
  • 1511 -- not
  • 1427 -- not
  • 1083
  • 1032
  • 1017 --?
  • 999 --?
  • 993 --?
  • 952 --?
  • 937 --?
  • 932
  • 870
  • 864. [2]
  • 830
  • 826
  • 802
  • 800
  • 781
See this - Global Volcanism Programme Record of Fuji Activity Guanlongwucaii ( talk) 09:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Guanlongwucaii reply

References

  1. ^ Shikuoka University page; see Japanese Wikipedia.
  2. ^ Titsingh, p. 118.

Problem with Dates of Old Fiji, Komitake

The dates listed in the introduction are overlapping and contradict the text below. Can someone who knows the history fix this? 170.63.96.108 ( talk) 14:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Is there any verifiable information in this article at all? It seems mostly unsupported and likely original research. It seems to me there should at least be a header drawing attention to the lack of references. 76.10.165.46 ( talk) 02:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook