This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
His Dark Materials (TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Why is the episode list part of the main page? Is this new policy? I tried creating the page, to move over the relevant section, but I got redirected to the main article. 2A02:A470:7AC5:1:3174:E8DB:D515:E3C7 ( talk) 23:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
There is some dispute over whether the premise should read "The witches' prophecy also links Lyra's destiny to Will Parry, a teenager from the real world" or "The witches' prophecy also links Lyra's destiny to Will Parry, a teenager from our world".
There is no indication that our everyday world is any more real than the other worlds explored in the books and TV series – or, rather, that the parallel worlds are any less real.
Even though "our world" contravenes WP:OUR, surely this is not cast in stone and is far clearer in this instance? Or can you think of something more appropriate? Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 11:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Neilinabbey: I undid your edit because, although The Guardian's own house style uses "the" for titles of newspapers, this article is not in The Guardian. Wikipedia's MOS requires "The Guardian" because the newspaper title includes "the". Bazza ( talk) 13:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Could someone verify the following recent changes to the description of the reception given for series 1, at Rotten Tomatoes?
2601:5C1:4580:1330:5D47:E1B7:854B:770B ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) changed the lede from:
All three series received generally positive reviews.
to While the first series received mostly mixed and low scores,"[2] the second and third series received generally positive reviews.
and Reception from:
Series one received positive reviews from critics.
to Series one received mixed-to-negative reviews from critics.
.
I note that the average rating has gone down from 6.99/10 to 5.75/10, but these descriptive changes sound too critical to me. Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
His Dark Materials (TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Why is the episode list part of the main page? Is this new policy? I tried creating the page, to move over the relevant section, but I got redirected to the main article. 2A02:A470:7AC5:1:3174:E8DB:D515:E3C7 ( talk) 23:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
There is some dispute over whether the premise should read "The witches' prophecy also links Lyra's destiny to Will Parry, a teenager from the real world" or "The witches' prophecy also links Lyra's destiny to Will Parry, a teenager from our world".
There is no indication that our everyday world is any more real than the other worlds explored in the books and TV series – or, rather, that the parallel worlds are any less real.
Even though "our world" contravenes WP:OUR, surely this is not cast in stone and is far clearer in this instance? Or can you think of something more appropriate? Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 11:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Neilinabbey: I undid your edit because, although The Guardian's own house style uses "the" for titles of newspapers, this article is not in The Guardian. Wikipedia's MOS requires "The Guardian" because the newspaper title includes "the". Bazza ( talk) 13:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Could someone verify the following recent changes to the description of the reception given for series 1, at Rotten Tomatoes?
2601:5C1:4580:1330:5D47:E1B7:854B:770B ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) changed the lede from:
All three series received generally positive reviews.
to While the first series received mostly mixed and low scores,"[2] the second and third series received generally positive reviews.
and Reception from:
Series one received positive reviews from critics.
to Series one received mixed-to-negative reviews from critics.
.
I note that the average rating has gone down from 6.99/10 to 5.75/10, but these descriptive changes sound too critical to me. Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)