![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Hiros. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Hiros at the Reference desk. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hiros redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Should the title of this article be "Hiros (Heroes episode)" for consistency with the other episode titles?
I made a change to the Peter Petrelli page last night to "fix" the episode title, and I found out this morning that I pointed it to a page that doesn't exist. Rather than just creating a redirect from (Heroes episode) to the plain title, or moving this page to that one, I though I'd ask here what is more appropriate in this matter. -- Psiphiorg 12:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
No. The only reason to use (an extension) is when there are other subjects with the same title. there's no other article titled Hiros, and I will estimate a 99.99% chance against another one being created.-- A c1983fan (yell at me) 11:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Should we start designing the articles as they go along instead of what happens to each character? Eventually they'll all meet up and Nathan's met Hiro and Niki, Peter met Mohinder and Isaac, and talked to Hiro, and D.L. finally showed up. I think it would be better. Please leave feedback and if there are valid reasons I won't change it. BioYu-Gi!. 15:58, 24 October 2006.
I'll expand it...I just watched it for the second time today. Toquinha 02:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I added a screencap to the infobox for this episode. Its the same one as they had for this episode on the List of Heroes episodes page. If anyone could think of a caption to go along with it, go ahead and add it. -- GhostStalker 21:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I removed part of the description of Isaac/Peter's painting in the second-to-last paragraph. It would appear that the cheerleader has NOT a hole in her chest; it's just the school logo.
As shown during the episode itself, the correct title of this episode is "Hiros", no apostrophe. My cable provider's guide mistakenly inserted an apostrophe in its guide ("Hiro's"), which may be where User:Shannernanner got the wrong title from. I have reverted the changes on this page and the episode list to the correct title. -- Psiphiorg 10:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
The plot summary does not seem overly long compared to One Giant Leap, so I guess that means it might be confusing or ambiguous. The internal link in the cleanup template message for "confusing or ambiguous" leads to a dead anchor (#Writing on fiction) - here's a link to writing about fiction - though I can't seem to find details there about cleaning up confusing or ambiguous plot summaries. Perhaps I'm just missing it. Regardless, I think it's a safe bet to think the plot summary can use some loving attention. Junior rookie | Talk 15:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
The creepy robber guy looks a lot like john hensley from nip/tuck, I thought about adding this, but wasn't sure. J-stan 01:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
When Nathan Petrelli signs the hotel bill, it has a Montecito logo at the top (32:55).
The episode summary was far too long so I did my best in shortening it. Still think it's too long but it's better then it was before. Lots42 12:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
"When the camera is panning around the train at the "frozen" people one of the people is Hiro, reading a newspaper. This is 17 seconds into the episode." I didn't notice this, but if it's true, it doesn't make sense. 'Present-day Hiro' is in Las Vegas, 'Future Hiro' is speaking to Peter on the train, so who's this 'third' Hiro? Or is it just an 'easter-egg', not meant to be part of the story? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.53.74.196 ( talk) 17:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Hiros. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Hiros at the Reference desk. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hiros redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Should the title of this article be "Hiros (Heroes episode)" for consistency with the other episode titles?
I made a change to the Peter Petrelli page last night to "fix" the episode title, and I found out this morning that I pointed it to a page that doesn't exist. Rather than just creating a redirect from (Heroes episode) to the plain title, or moving this page to that one, I though I'd ask here what is more appropriate in this matter. -- Psiphiorg 12:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
No. The only reason to use (an extension) is when there are other subjects with the same title. there's no other article titled Hiros, and I will estimate a 99.99% chance against another one being created.-- A c1983fan (yell at me) 11:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Should we start designing the articles as they go along instead of what happens to each character? Eventually they'll all meet up and Nathan's met Hiro and Niki, Peter met Mohinder and Isaac, and talked to Hiro, and D.L. finally showed up. I think it would be better. Please leave feedback and if there are valid reasons I won't change it. BioYu-Gi!. 15:58, 24 October 2006.
I'll expand it...I just watched it for the second time today. Toquinha 02:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I added a screencap to the infobox for this episode. Its the same one as they had for this episode on the List of Heroes episodes page. If anyone could think of a caption to go along with it, go ahead and add it. -- GhostStalker 21:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I removed part of the description of Isaac/Peter's painting in the second-to-last paragraph. It would appear that the cheerleader has NOT a hole in her chest; it's just the school logo.
As shown during the episode itself, the correct title of this episode is "Hiros", no apostrophe. My cable provider's guide mistakenly inserted an apostrophe in its guide ("Hiro's"), which may be where User:Shannernanner got the wrong title from. I have reverted the changes on this page and the episode list to the correct title. -- Psiphiorg 10:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
The plot summary does not seem overly long compared to One Giant Leap, so I guess that means it might be confusing or ambiguous. The internal link in the cleanup template message for "confusing or ambiguous" leads to a dead anchor (#Writing on fiction) - here's a link to writing about fiction - though I can't seem to find details there about cleaning up confusing or ambiguous plot summaries. Perhaps I'm just missing it. Regardless, I think it's a safe bet to think the plot summary can use some loving attention. Junior rookie | Talk 15:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
The creepy robber guy looks a lot like john hensley from nip/tuck, I thought about adding this, but wasn't sure. J-stan 01:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
When Nathan Petrelli signs the hotel bill, it has a Montecito logo at the top (32:55).
The episode summary was far too long so I did my best in shortening it. Still think it's too long but it's better then it was before. Lots42 12:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
"When the camera is panning around the train at the "frozen" people one of the people is Hiro, reading a newspaper. This is 17 seconds into the episode." I didn't notice this, but if it's true, it doesn't make sense. 'Present-day Hiro' is in Las Vegas, 'Future Hiro' is speaking to Peter on the train, so who's this 'third' Hiro? Or is it just an 'easter-egg', not meant to be part of the story? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.53.74.196 ( talk) 17:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)