This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hindustan Times article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shame that no comment on current the propaganda of Hindustan Times can be published on this side. This means that the article about Hindustan Times is an untrusted and biased source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:25EC:5A01:A9B7:DB27:B697:9502 ( talk) 21:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Could someone do something in a way of a structural reorganisation as in Dawn (newspaper) with contents links etc. As it is I don't find the article particuarly easy to read. -- Blueincubus 10:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Why is every evidence of russian propaganda deleted? There is plenty of evidence for this. A simple fact check on their youtube channel will lead after 10 seconds to the conclusion that russian propaganda is spread. For example, on 17th February they claimed that NATO soldiers participate in the war on Ukrainian side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:a61:24e6:d601:d02b:6b3c:a22:207e ( talk) 20:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Is this name correctly spelt? Who was this person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.146.35 ( talk) 17:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Section History says
But according to that source,
The long quote that makes up the following paragraph of this article says [2]
The source article continues
So we have three candidates: K. M. Panikkar, Sadar Panikkar, and Devdas Gandhi. It seems most likely that the book's detailed report is accurate and more reliable than Shobhana Bhartia's reminiscence. (Note: Panikkar is used both as a surname and as a title of respect.)
-- Thnidu ( talk) 17:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |newspaper=
(
help)
{{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindustan Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hindustan Times updated their logo and newspaper's look. It should be updated. BihariGuy ( talk) 05:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Has Shishir Gupta left the paper? I don't think he has. AltruisticHomoSapien ( talk) 01:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Tayi Arajakte Can you add more than just a snide personal attack you made on this unnecessary revert to restore a incoherent section? None of these non-notable and regular incidents caused any "controversy" against Hindustan Times. The whole section also contradicts WP:NOCRIT. If you are so eager to write about these non-notable WP:NOTNEWS incidents, you can do that on their own articles. Azuredivay ( talk) 10:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Media Bias/Fact Check has been determined to be unreliable WP:MBFC and cannot be used. If the IP editor doesn't self revert, I'll be seeking WP:AN3 help — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 20:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
-> Media Bias is described as being "A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems." in a scientific study: /info/en/?search=Media_Bias/Fact_Check — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:a61:24e6:d601:d02b:6b3c:a22:207e ( talk) 20:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
The above comment is exactly for you. Media Bias/Fact Check is deemed unreliable source and cannot be used on Wikipedia. Please see WP:MBFC — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 21:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Removing all passages of the involvement of Hindustan Times in russian propaganda in the Ukraine war is a breach of the following neutrality rules: "Generally, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely because it seems biased. Instead, try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone. Biased information can usually be balanced with material cited to other sources to produce a more neutral perspective, so such problems should be fixed when possible through the normal editing process. Remove material when you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage. The sections below offer specific guidance on common problems." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:24F1:8901:396E:1270:5276:B347 ( talk) 19:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
today, the youtube channel of HT published a video with the title "how Putin's men are destroying West's weapons before they reach Kyev". this video needs to be classified as Russian propaganda as journalistic standards and objective reporting are not adhered to. 91.183.69.144 ( talk) 20:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Political alignment of newspaper is missing. Its sister newspaper Mint has this entry DrDSAK ( talk) 08:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hindustan Times article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shame that no comment on current the propaganda of Hindustan Times can be published on this side. This means that the article about Hindustan Times is an untrusted and biased source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:25EC:5A01:A9B7:DB27:B697:9502 ( talk) 21:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Could someone do something in a way of a structural reorganisation as in Dawn (newspaper) with contents links etc. As it is I don't find the article particuarly easy to read. -- Blueincubus 10:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Why is every evidence of russian propaganda deleted? There is plenty of evidence for this. A simple fact check on their youtube channel will lead after 10 seconds to the conclusion that russian propaganda is spread. For example, on 17th February they claimed that NATO soldiers participate in the war on Ukrainian side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:a61:24e6:d601:d02b:6b3c:a22:207e ( talk) 20:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Is this name correctly spelt? Who was this person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.146.35 ( talk) 17:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Section History says
But according to that source,
The long quote that makes up the following paragraph of this article says [2]
The source article continues
So we have three candidates: K. M. Panikkar, Sadar Panikkar, and Devdas Gandhi. It seems most likely that the book's detailed report is accurate and more reliable than Shobhana Bhartia's reminiscence. (Note: Panikkar is used both as a surname and as a title of respect.)
-- Thnidu ( talk) 17:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |newspaper=
(
help)
{{
cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(
help)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindustan Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Hindustan Times updated their logo and newspaper's look. It should be updated. BihariGuy ( talk) 05:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Has Shishir Gupta left the paper? I don't think he has. AltruisticHomoSapien ( talk) 01:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Tayi Arajakte Can you add more than just a snide personal attack you made on this unnecessary revert to restore a incoherent section? None of these non-notable and regular incidents caused any "controversy" against Hindustan Times. The whole section also contradicts WP:NOCRIT. If you are so eager to write about these non-notable WP:NOTNEWS incidents, you can do that on their own articles. Azuredivay ( talk) 10:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Media Bias/Fact Check has been determined to be unreliable WP:MBFC and cannot be used. If the IP editor doesn't self revert, I'll be seeking WP:AN3 help — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 20:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
-> Media Bias is described as being "A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems." in a scientific study: /info/en/?search=Media_Bias/Fact_Check — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:a61:24e6:d601:d02b:6b3c:a22:207e ( talk) 20:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
The above comment is exactly for you. Media Bias/Fact Check is deemed unreliable source and cannot be used on Wikipedia. Please see WP:MBFC — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 21:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Removing all passages of the involvement of Hindustan Times in russian propaganda in the Ukraine war is a breach of the following neutrality rules: "Generally, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely because it seems biased. Instead, try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone. Biased information can usually be balanced with material cited to other sources to produce a more neutral perspective, so such problems should be fixed when possible through the normal editing process. Remove material when you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage. The sections below offer specific guidance on common problems." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:24F1:8901:396E:1270:5276:B347 ( talk) 19:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
today, the youtube channel of HT published a video with the title "how Putin's men are destroying West's weapons before they reach Kyev". this video needs to be classified as Russian propaganda as journalistic standards and objective reporting are not adhered to. 91.183.69.144 ( talk) 20:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Political alignment of newspaper is missing. Its sister newspaper Mint has this entry DrDSAK ( talk) 08:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)