This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Hindlip Hall appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 218 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I've re edited the article to cut out the lengthy, off-topic history of the
Gunpowder Plot that has its own article. I've kept the cut material in this
Special Page and will be looking to see if any of it can be salvaged and integrated into the main Gunpowder Plot article.
If anyone opposes this modification, let's talk about it here before just blindly reverting the edit.--
Kudpung (
talk)
07:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ummm blindly changing edits ... wouldn't dream of it. Always best to discuss large changes with active editors before making large changes. Best to consult .... um .... well at least we've started the idea now. Yes on a quick examination it appears that a start article has been converted into a stub. Hindlip Hall is not important to the Gunpowder Plot .... its the opposite way round. I don't understand the rationale of the last large change/ deletion. Was it discussed elsewhere? Is it normal to take articles that have been through a consensus process and store them on someones sandbox page? This is odd. Victuallers ( talk) 16:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I feel too biased about this. Suggest you or I ask someone at WP Worcester to decide if the lead up to the events of 1606 at Red Hill, Worcester are notable or not. As they are now removed them from this article which records ownership but ignores that one owner weas nearly on the scaffold with these people. Victuallers ( talk) 14:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted to the version with more information, per WP:PRESERVE. There is no reason why that information shouldn't be in there. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindlip Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindlip Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Hindlip Hall appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 12 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 218 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
I've re edited the article to cut out the lengthy, off-topic history of the
Gunpowder Plot that has its own article. I've kept the cut material in this
Special Page and will be looking to see if any of it can be salvaged and integrated into the main Gunpowder Plot article.
If anyone opposes this modification, let's talk about it here before just blindly reverting the edit.--
Kudpung (
talk)
07:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ummm blindly changing edits ... wouldn't dream of it. Always best to discuss large changes with active editors before making large changes. Best to consult .... um .... well at least we've started the idea now. Yes on a quick examination it appears that a start article has been converted into a stub. Hindlip Hall is not important to the Gunpowder Plot .... its the opposite way round. I don't understand the rationale of the last large change/ deletion. Was it discussed elsewhere? Is it normal to take articles that have been through a consensus process and store them on someones sandbox page? This is odd. Victuallers ( talk) 16:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
I feel too biased about this. Suggest you or I ask someone at WP Worcester to decide if the lead up to the events of 1606 at Red Hill, Worcester are notable or not. As they are now removed them from this article which records ownership but ignores that one owner weas nearly on the scaffold with these people. Victuallers ( talk) 14:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted to the version with more information, per WP:PRESERVE. There is no reason why that information shouldn't be in there. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindlip Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hindlip Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)