This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gender studies This redirect is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this redirect, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Am I the only one who thinks this is not at all about Asmahan Mansour? There is no biographical information about the girl, and her only claim to fame is to be ejected from a soccer game because she wore a hijab. The article is essentially just about the news event that was her ejection from a soccer game and the various publicized reactions to this. As such, it should be either deleted (Wiki is not a news site) or renamed if that event is deemed historically significant in itself. Else it should be merged with the reasonable accommodation article.-- Boffob 16:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I just put the merge tag today, as the article has been renamed. It's still the same article it was about a somewhat insignificant (by itself) news event, and as such, violates WP:NOT#NEWS. It should be summarized and incoporated into the reasonable accommodation article.-- Boffob ( talk) 15:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply