This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This article is a stub, has no references, and is only linked to from high-speed rail -- not even from tilting train. I think that its topic is useful, but I cannot really see that it justifies more than a section (or sub-section) in either or both of high-speed rail and tilting train. That said, I think the table may have a use, but as a template which may be used by both articles.
An alternative for the table might be to merge it into Template:High-speed rail, either by flagging the tilting trains in the latter, or by splitting the trains into "non-tilting" and "tilting" columns. I'd also suggest that the high-speed aspect could be merged into Template:Tilting trains, but there isn't one (at the moment).
I think that begs several questions:
Tim PF ( talk) 14:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
My current plan is:
{{
see also}}
to
tilting trains. This will need to gather up most of the tilt rationale from elsewhere in the article, and needs a bit more thought.How does it look so far? Tim PF ( talk) 14:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This article is a stub, has no references, and is only linked to from high-speed rail -- not even from tilting train. I think that its topic is useful, but I cannot really see that it justifies more than a section (or sub-section) in either or both of high-speed rail and tilting train. That said, I think the table may have a use, but as a template which may be used by both articles.
An alternative for the table might be to merge it into Template:High-speed rail, either by flagging the tilting trains in the latter, or by splitting the trains into "non-tilting" and "tilting" columns. I'd also suggest that the high-speed aspect could be merged into Template:Tilting trains, but there isn't one (at the moment).
I think that begs several questions:
Tim PF ( talk) 14:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
My current plan is:
{{
see also}}
to
tilting trains. This will need to gather up most of the tilt rationale from elsewhere in the article, and needs a bit more thought.How does it look so far? Tim PF ( talk) 14:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)