![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I thought that High Justice series wasn't part of the CodDominium series? Does anyone know what Pournelle had to say about it? -- Eldarone 17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
There is no doubt that the stories reflect Pournelle's political and ideological point of view. That does not mean that the articel about them should also reflect and outspokenly endorse them. For example, it is a ligitmate view to think it would be better when companies have no trade unions, but this very much of non-Neutral Point of View. The whole article should be re-written adding "Pournelle thinks that" or "The story reflects Pournelle's view about" etc. User:Adam Keller
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I thought that High Justice series wasn't part of the CodDominium series? Does anyone know what Pournelle had to say about it? -- Eldarone 17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
There is no doubt that the stories reflect Pournelle's political and ideological point of view. That does not mean that the articel about them should also reflect and outspokenly endorse them. For example, it is a ligitmate view to think it would be better when companies have no trade unions, but this very much of non-Neutral Point of View. The whole article should be re-written adding "Pournelle thinks that" or "The story reflects Pournelle's view about" etc. User:Adam Keller
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)