This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Epistemology / Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Epistemology Philosophy of science Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Levels of evidence page were merged into Hierarchy of evidence. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

How does "expert opinion" relate to "scientific opinion"?

-- Charley Coleman 02:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply

I propose that we merge levels of evidence to hierarchy of evidence. These two pages are on essentially the same subject. Wikiman2718 ( talk) 21:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC) reply

There's a template that says that this article disagrees with another article. Please see discussion. However, there is no discussion. How am I supposed to figure out in what way they contradict if no one's mentioned anything? 75.159.45.228 ( talk) 10:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Christopher J Blunt wrote about the history of hie]rarchies of evidence, probably one of the only expert resources on this topic: [1] [2]. This is unfortunately self-published (although he wrote a PhD Thesis on the topic, maybe there are duplicated information there), but may be of interest nevertheless, given the paucity of expert information on the topic. Best regards. -- Lyrono ( talk) 05:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC) reply