This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hiba Abu Nada article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, her username on Twitter is "HebaAbuNada" and on Instagram, it is "Heba", not "Hiba". Nehaoua ( talk) 19:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
@ MJL: Starting discussion of her last words regarding this reversion. -- Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 18:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
"On 20 October 2023, she was killed in the Israel–Hamas war, during an airstrike by the Israeli Air Force, which hit her home in Khan Yunis in southern Gaza."
This sentence could be phrased better I think. It uses two "during" timeframes, and splits the verb and direct object. Maybe splitting it into two statements, and using a more direct sentence structure would make it clearer? Also, using a piped link could convey the scope better in this instance; the name of the conflict lacks consensus (checking it's talk page) and as it's used here, might give a false impression that the subject was a participant or combatant instead of a bystander. For example:
"On 20 October 2023, she was killed by an airstrike conducted by the Israeli Airforce, which destroyed her home in Khan Yunis. The airstrike was part of an [2023_Israel–Hamas_war|Israeli campaign] in southern Gaza." 24.249.89.69 ( talk) 21:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The article says she was a Wikimedian. Would it be appropriate to link to her userpage, either on the main page or on the talk page? Is there a relevant Wikipedia policy when notable people have died, who were also active on Wikimedia, even though that was not their source of notability? -- Gerrit C U T E D H 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hiba Abu Nada article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, her username on Twitter is "HebaAbuNada" and on Instagram, it is "Heba", not "Hiba". Nehaoua ( talk) 19:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
@ MJL: Starting discussion of her last words regarding this reversion. -- Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 18:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
"On 20 October 2023, she was killed in the Israel–Hamas war, during an airstrike by the Israeli Air Force, which hit her home in Khan Yunis in southern Gaza."
This sentence could be phrased better I think. It uses two "during" timeframes, and splits the verb and direct object. Maybe splitting it into two statements, and using a more direct sentence structure would make it clearer? Also, using a piped link could convey the scope better in this instance; the name of the conflict lacks consensus (checking it's talk page) and as it's used here, might give a false impression that the subject was a participant or combatant instead of a bystander. For example:
"On 20 October 2023, she was killed by an airstrike conducted by the Israeli Airforce, which destroyed her home in Khan Yunis. The airstrike was part of an [2023_Israel–Hamas_war|Israeli campaign] in southern Gaza." 24.249.89.69 ( talk) 21:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The article says she was a Wikimedian. Would it be appropriate to link to her userpage, either on the main page or on the talk page? Is there a relevant Wikipedia policy when notable people have died, who were also active on Wikimedia, even though that was not their source of notability? -- Gerrit C U T E D H 09:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)