This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hetty Reckless article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Hetty Reckless appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 February 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | Hetty Reckless was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 1, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I was trying to find new information on Hetty and came across this old article from the Courier Post. There's some interesting, and conflicting, information in there that I'd like to use, but don't know the appropriate way to do so (as it's a cached link on a defunct page). Any suggestions are appreciated. Ckoerner ( talk) 18:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 13:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review; seems like a great topic for a GA.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
13:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I could quibble about source formatting, but that's not necessary for GAC purposes; the sources themselves all look appropriate. I would also be tempted to place the main section titles as subsections under the title of "Life" or something akin, but, again, not a necessary change. However, this seems like a strong article that I'm fairly sure can be promoted to GA status soon. I've made a few small edits; please double-check. Josh Milburn ( talk) 14:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Hetty Reckless. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hetty Reckless article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Hetty Reckless appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 February 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | Hetty Reckless was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 1, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I was trying to find new information on Hetty and came across this old article from the Courier Post. There's some interesting, and conflicting, information in there that I'd like to use, but don't know the appropriate way to do so (as it's a cached link on a defunct page). Any suggestions are appreciated. Ckoerner ( talk) 18:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 13:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review; seems like a great topic for a GA.
Josh Milburn (
talk)
13:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I could quibble about source formatting, but that's not necessary for GAC purposes; the sources themselves all look appropriate. I would also be tempted to place the main section titles as subsections under the title of "Life" or something akin, but, again, not a necessary change. However, this seems like a strong article that I'm fairly sure can be promoted to GA status soon. I've made a few small edits; please double-check. Josh Milburn ( talk) 14:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Hetty Reckless. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)