This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Viruses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

most monospot tests these days would not be horse RBC but latex agglutination? should this be written in? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.166.206 ( talk) 11:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply

the ranges of sensitivity are high but to say that a negative result is probably true is a misleading statement. Like I said a 70-92% sensitivity range is decent but should not be considered absolute. I think it should be reworded. AriaNo11 ( talk) 00:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

This entry is a poor example of technical writing, especially the process section. "Lab supervisor, and procedure writer..." HiberniaTX ( talk) 22:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The incubation period for infectious mononucleosis is 4-6 weeks, not 4-6 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.65.1 ( talk) 08:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC) reply