This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Civil engineering This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please note that this section is essentially original research. While the New York Times article mentions both Herrenknecht and the Iranian nuclear program, this article makes no connection between the two. And certainly does not speculate as the criticism section does. 2A02:A451:8B2D:1:859A:89E8:28A7:B99D ( talk) 17:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

And it was too much for you to use the article talkpage to explain your deletions until now, instead of edit-warring and harassing other editors who were restoring what they was assumed to be a claim with a citation?-- Mr Fink ( talk) 17:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

And pointing out that you are insisting on hounding editors is not a personal attack, either.-- Mr Fink ( talk) 23:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Warning other editors is not hounding or harassing. It's nice that the assumed tht this was a claim with a citation, but then one should also assume that these editors check the citation as well as the claim before reverting/re-adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A451:8B2D:1:255F:D375:6CD0:8B17 ( talk) 23:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC) reply