This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Anime and manga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Why is this page have a list of the anime programmes it shows? It is against the NPOV right? Is it considered bussiness advertising? I think this page needs some retyping...

I agree. But have you forgotten that Wikipedia is a kind of Encyclopeia? chimerarc —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Exclusive or first seen? Those are 2 different things. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 15:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply

I think first seen will be better. - 上村七美 | talk 15:42, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Yes, first seen. With exclusive, it gives the listener/reader the meaning that UNTIL NOW that particular thing can only be seen in that particular place. But with first seen? It gives the impression that although now seen in other places, it was first seen in that place.(see I even used that word in its own explanation.) Pathbinder 16:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC) reply

• Support. -- Howard t he Du c k 13:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Although the channel is sometimes called "Hero TV," the logo never says so. - 上村七美 | talk 14:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Well, I thought it was the more popular name? (And I didn't see "CBS" at the CBS logo either). Note that we don't have to use the official name but the more popular name. -- Howard t he Du c k 14:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Well, both "Hero" and "Hero TV" are used. So we can't say which name is more popular. - 上村七美 | talk 15:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply

The article contains no references of any kind and is in need of a through cleanup, especially in regards to several sentences which need to be rewritten with the correct tense and format. Unless these issues are dealt with as soon as possible, removing maintainance tags would not be prudent. ··· 巌流 ^{? · talk to ganryuu} 15:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC) reply