This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Logic / Modern Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Metaphysics Logic Modern philosophy Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Would someone be willing to attempt a merge of this article with Rudolph Hermann Lotze? Nagelfar 10:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Rudolf Hermann Lotze already exists. There should of course be a merge, once the more correct name (f/ph) can be determined. Charles Matthews 13:06, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oh good, I was worried that there wasn't an article. I did this article off of a desk encyclopedia abstract, this was the spelling it had. [[User:Rhymeless| Rhymeless | (Methyl Remiss)]] 20:20, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

A worthy section, without doubt, but one that was cut directly from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article which is under COPYRIGHT (!!) [Copyright © 2005 by David Sullivan]. If you want to refer to the now-deleted list, just scroll down to "External links" and click on the "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" link; it’s there. If you would like to reintroduce the Selected secondary literature, please by all means, but do your own research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimaingram ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply