![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I compared the article to the answers.com article pointed to in the CSD notice. While the article is based in part on the answers.com article, I don't see any extended sections of copied text. Given this, the CSD is not uncontroversial and the CSD should be declined. -- Mark viking ( talk) 05:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Does anybody know on what basis the eight cancer syndromes in the Syndromes section were chosen? It surely cannot be exhaustive as there are other syndromes mentioned in the Genetics section. Would it not make more sense to simply allow people to follow hyperlinks to the relevant pages? If there is a particular selection, e.g., on the basis of prevalence of the syndromes, then I think this should be made explicit. Ts4079 ( talk) 10:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... I compared the article to the answers.com article pointed to in the CSD notice. While the article is based in part on the answers.com article, I don't see any extended sections of copied text. Given this, the CSD is not uncontroversial and the CSD should be declined. -- Mark viking ( talk) 05:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Does anybody know on what basis the eight cancer syndromes in the Syndromes section were chosen? It surely cannot be exhaustive as there are other syndromes mentioned in the Genetics section. Would it not make more sense to simply allow people to follow hyperlinks to the relevant pages? If there is a particular selection, e.g., on the basis of prevalence of the syndromes, then I think this should be made explicit. Ts4079 ( talk) 10:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)