This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Herbert Greenfield is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 10, 2011. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This is a well-written and interesting article. I did a bit of copyediting and had just a few things left to mention:
Aside from this list, the article meets the six GA criteria. I will place the nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 02:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I made a couple of edits that I would like you to look over (the one about the poor performance and the one about the successful membership drive). The information comes from reliable sources, but my concern is that it needs to be presented as such. Without letting readers know directly, they could (incorrectly) assume that the article was written by someone who is trying to push a point of view. If you are fine with the way these appear now, all of my concerns will have been addressed. If not, we can continue to discuss these until we find something that works better. Thanks for your quick responses and hard work, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
With that said, the article now meets all of the Good Article criteria, so I am promoting it. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I have a book on Alberta premiers, and it's listing Greenfield's birth year as 1868. The source cited is
"United Kingdom. General Register Office, "Herbert Greenfield," Winchester, County of Southampton, 20 December 1868, no. 417, [Certified Copy of RBirth Registration], reproduced 12 August 12 2005; Ernest F. Chambers, ed, The Canadian Parliamentary Guide, 1925 ed. (Ottawa:Mortimer Co., 1925), p. 522.".
Which one would be correct? Connormah ( talk | contribs) 20:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Herbert Greenfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Herbert Greenfield is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 10, 2011. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This is a well-written and interesting article. I did a bit of copyediting and had just a few things left to mention:
Aside from this list, the article meets the six GA criteria. I will place the nomination on hold to allow for these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can be left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 02:26, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I made a couple of edits that I would like you to look over (the one about the poor performance and the one about the successful membership drive). The information comes from reliable sources, but my concern is that it needs to be presented as such. Without letting readers know directly, they could (incorrectly) assume that the article was written by someone who is trying to push a point of view. If you are fine with the way these appear now, all of my concerns will have been addressed. If not, we can continue to discuss these until we find something that works better. Thanks for your quick responses and hard work, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
With that said, the article now meets all of the Good Article criteria, so I am promoting it. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 16:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I have a book on Alberta premiers, and it's listing Greenfield's birth year as 1868. The source cited is
"United Kingdom. General Register Office, "Herbert Greenfield," Winchester, County of Southampton, 20 December 1868, no. 417, [Certified Copy of RBirth Registration], reproduced 12 August 12 2005; Ernest F. Chambers, ed, The Canadian Parliamentary Guide, 1925 ed. (Ottawa:Mortimer Co., 1925), p. 522.".
Which one would be correct? Connormah ( talk | contribs) 20:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Herbert Greenfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)