The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Triplestop x3 18:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The sources appear to be reliable, and the coverage good. However I still see problems involving the clarity of this page.
The following parts of the lead may be confusing to the reader.
Symptoms section looks fine.
The mechanism section:
I'm going to go ahead and pass this. Sorry for the delay, as I was trying to get a third opinion. My biggest concern is the prose quality however I believe that this article is good enough for GA. Triplestop x3 21:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Triplestop x3 18:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The sources appear to be reliable, and the coverage good. However I still see problems involving the clarity of this page.
The following parts of the lead may be confusing to the reader.
Symptoms section looks fine.
The mechanism section:
I'm going to go ahead and pass this. Sorry for the delay, as I was trying to get a third opinion. My biggest concern is the prose quality however I believe that this article is good enough for GA. Triplestop x3 21:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)