This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lepidoptera Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Australia: Biota Low‑importance Heosphora is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I found a page that lists significantly more species than than I have on the article, just wondering if it's reliable. Here's the link: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/pyraloidea/pyralidae/phycitinae/heosphora/ Thanks. TheLordOfWikis ( talk) 15:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

@ TheLordOfWikis: We have long treated Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms, run by Markku Savela as reliable. His pages often link to original descriptions which are very useful. I don't know much about how it is run or who sponsors it besides Savela and FUNET, but I'd like to know more.  SchreiberBike |  ⌨  22:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply