Henry Raup Wagner was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 25, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Mesoamerica ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 12, 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry Raup Wagner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias ( talk · contribs) 16:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Will start reviewing this shortly. Kaiser matias ( talk) 16:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Seeing how the nominator is retired, and doesn't seem to be coming back anytime soon, I'm going to fail this; if someone wants to re-nominate it in the future, I'll be happy to review it then, but at this point it would just be a waste of time. Kaiser matias ( talk) 01:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply