Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ProKro ( talk · contribs) 16:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• "There he captained..." – "There, he captained..." (Comma)

• Done. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• "The following day he was killed in action." – "He was killed in action the following day." (Either work; more common wording)

• I prefer to keep as it is, if that's ok. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Sure thing. ProKro ( talk) 00:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• "In 1908 he was a member..." – "In 1908, he was a member..." (Comma)

• OK. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• "On 6 September 1913..." – On 6 September 1913,... (Comma)

• OK. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• "24 hours later on 9 August 1915,..." – "Twenty-four hours later on 9 August 1915,..." (While not strictly incorrect, majority of Stylebooks and Manuals of Style recommend starting a sentence with a number written out rather than in its the numerical form; in this case 24.)

• Absolutely. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Article is concise and focused with only a few minor spelling and/or syntactic errors. Text is easy to read, it is interesting and engaging.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   All concerns addressed. Y

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   References are few but reliable and verifiable. Y

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral Y

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

   There are no copyvios or other issues. Y

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• While not as prominent as in the Albert Downing and Arthur James Dingle articles, there are some chiefly British/New Zealand English spelling preferences, so I'd suggest putting the New Zealand English tag in the article's talk page.

• Tagged British. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Same as with the other articles, I'd suggest changing the date format.

• I prefer to keep British English date format for consistency, if that's ok. FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

• Noted. Discuss over at Albert Downing/GA1. ProKro ( talk) 00:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Just as with Albert Downing, it's an easy pass. As soon as the issues are addressed, the article'll be good-to-go. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. ProKro ( talk) 22:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for all three of these! FunkyCanute ( talk) 13:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Sure thing and congratulations! Pass ProKro ( talk) 00:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply