This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article just lists a bunch of people who the person in question is related to, none of whom even have articles themselves.--
Lairor02:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
In fact, Henrietta Maria Stanley was de jure suo jure 4th Baroness Strange, as may be seen by consulting the Complete Peerage, vol XII/1, p. 338, or Burke's Peerage 1999, p. 2726. Charlotte Murray was the 8th Baroness Strange, succeeding in 1764. - Nunh-huh03:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
So tell me how we're going to turn this into
the perfect article. I'd suggest you make one page for this whole family if all you're going to list on the individual pages is how they're related to each other.--
Lairor03:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Perfect is the enemy of the good. Deleting information isn't an appropriate response to your frustration that the article isn't perfect. = Nunh-huh04:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Nunh-huh, the reference provided sounds good, but part of the misunderstanding here may arise from the fact that the article itself is unreferenced. If you have checked the reference, then it would be helpful to add the reference to the article, rather than just on the talk page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)12:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Actually, I think the problem is that Lairor was misusing the word "verified" to mean "my objection to the notability of peers has been answered". But yes, of course I checked the references, and I'll be happy to add them. - Nunh-huh23:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article just lists a bunch of people who the person in question is related to, none of whom even have articles themselves.--
Lairor02:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
In fact, Henrietta Maria Stanley was de jure suo jure 4th Baroness Strange, as may be seen by consulting the Complete Peerage, vol XII/1, p. 338, or Burke's Peerage 1999, p. 2726. Charlotte Murray was the 8th Baroness Strange, succeeding in 1764. - Nunh-huh03:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
So tell me how we're going to turn this into
the perfect article. I'd suggest you make one page for this whole family if all you're going to list on the individual pages is how they're related to each other.--
Lairor03:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Perfect is the enemy of the good. Deleting information isn't an appropriate response to your frustration that the article isn't perfect. = Nunh-huh04:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Nunh-huh, the reference provided sounds good, but part of the misunderstanding here may arise from the fact that the article itself is unreferenced. If you have checked the reference, then it would be helpful to add the reference to the article, rather than just on the talk page. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)12:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Actually, I think the problem is that Lairor was misusing the word "verified" to mean "my objection to the notability of peers has been answered". But yes, of course I checked the references, and I'll be happy to add them. - Nunh-huh23:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply